Literature DB >> 18041642

Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.

Markku Linnainmaa1, Juha Laitinen, Ari Leskinen, Olli Sippula, Pentti Kalliokoski.   

Abstract

The performance of four sampling devices for inhalable dust and three devices for respirable dust was tested with different kinds of dusts in the laboratory and in the field. The IOM sampler was chosen as the reference method for inhalable dust, and the IOM sampler provided with the porous plastic foam media was used as the reference method for respirable dust. The other tested instruments were the Button sampler, the optical Grimm aerosol monitor, and the Dekati two-stage cascade impactor with cutoff sizes of 10 and 4 mu m. The study confirmed the applicability of the IOM and Button samplers. The new foam product followed the respirable criteria well. However, the foam sampler was unstable for measuring inhalable dust, probably due to its moisture absorption. In addition, high dust loads should be avoided with the foam sampler due to increase in filtering efficiency. The concentrations of inhalable dust measured with the Button sampler, the Grimm monitor, and the impactor sampler were usually close to those measured with the reference sampler. On the other hand, impactor sampling yielded higher respirable dust concentrations than the reference method in the field, which may have been caused by particle bounce; high dust loads should be avoided while using the impactor. The results also showed that the Grimm monitor enables real-time dust concentration determinations that are accurate enough for routine monitoring of occupational exposure and for testing efficiency of control measures in workplaces.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18041642     DOI: 10.1080/15459620701763723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  7 in total

1.  Design and computational fluid dynamics investigation of a personal, high flow inhalable sampler.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Andrea C Landázuri; Mike Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-04-23

2.  Development of a sampler for total aerosol deposition in the human respiratory tract.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Phillip Clark; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-07-28

3.  Exposure assessment and associated lung deposition calculations for vehicular exhaust in four metropolitan cities of Pakistan.

Authors:  Hussain Majid; Khan Alam; Pierre Madl; Werner Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A field evaluation of a single sampler for respirable and inhalable indium and dust measurements at an indium-tin oxide manufacturing facility.

Authors:  Brie Hawley Blackley; Jenna L Gibbs; Kristin J Cummings; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Ji Young Park; Marcia Stanton; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  Review of Workplace Based Aerosol Sampler Comparison Studies, 2004-2020.

Authors:  James Hanlon; Karen S Galea; Steven Verpaele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Estimating Respirable Dust Exposure from Inhalable Dust Exposure.

Authors:  Cornelia Wippich; Jörg Rissler; Dorothea Koppisch; Dietmar Breuer
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.179

7.  Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration.

Authors:  Ilpo Kulmala; Markku Linnainmaa; Anna Kokkonen; Kimmo Heinonen; Tomi Kanerva; Arto Säämänen
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.