Literature DB >> 20079877

Radiation microbeams as spatial and temporal probes of subcellular and tissue response.

Giuseppe Schettino1, Shahnaz T Al Rashid, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

Understanding the effects of ionizing radiations are key to determining their optimal use in therapy and assessing risks from exposure. The development of microbeams where radiations can be delivered in a highly temporal and spatially constrained manner has been a major advance. Several different types of radiation microbeams have been developed using X-rays, charged particles and electrons. For charged particles, beams can be targeted with sub-micron accuracy into biological samples and the lowest possible dose of a single particle track can be delivered with high reproducibility. Microbeams have provided powerful tools for understanding the kinetics of DNA damage and formation under conditions of physiological relevance and have significant advantages over other approaches for producing localized DNA damage, such as variable wavelength laser beam approaches. Recent studies have extended their use to probing for radiosensitive sites outside the cell nucleus, and testing for mechanisms underpinning bystander responses where irradiated and non-irradiated cells communicate with each other. Ongoing developments include the ability to locally target regions of 3D tissue models and ultimately to target localized regions in vivo. With future advances in radiation delivery and imaging microbeams will continue to be applied in a range of biological studies. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20079877      PMCID: PMC2871964          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  91 in total

1.  Irradiation of parts of individual cells.

Authors:  R E ZIRKLE; W BLOOM
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Low-dose binary behavior of bystander cell killing after microbeam irradiation of a single cell with focused c(k) x rays.

Authors:  Giuseppe Schettino; Melvyn Folkard; Barry D Michael; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  53BP1 exchanges slowly at the sites of DNA damage and appears to require RNA for its association with chromatin.

Authors:  Fiona Pryde; Shirin Khalili; Kathryn Robertson; Jim Selfridge; Ann-Marie Ritchie; David W Melton; Denis Jullien; Yasuhisa Adachi
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Microbeams of heavy charged particles.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Tomoo Funayama; Seiichi Wada; Yoshiya Furusawa; Mizuho Aoki; Chunlin Shao; Yuichiro Yokota; Tetsuya Sakashita; Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Takehiko Kakizaki; Nobuyuki Hamada
Journal:  Biol Sci Space       Date:  2004-12

5.  Live cell imaging of heavy-ion-induced radiation responses by beamline microscopy.

Authors:  B Jakob; J H Rudolph; N Gueven; M F Lavin; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Localization of checkpoint and repair proteins in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.079

7.  ATM activation in normal human tissues and testicular cancer.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Christopher J Bakkenist; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Niels E Skakkebaek; Maxwell Sehested; Jiri Lukas; Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Deficiency in the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase causes down-regulation of ATM.

Authors:  Yuanlin Peng; Rick G Woods; Heather Beamish; Ruiqiong Ye; Susan P Lees-Miller; Martin F Lavin; Joel S Bedford
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; C Boon; C Redon; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  In silico nanodosimetry: new insights into nontargeted biological responses to radiation.

Authors:  Zdenka Kuncic; Hilary L Byrne; Aimee L McNamara; Susanna Guatelli; Westa Domanova; Sébastien Incerti
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Single α-particle irradiation permits real-time visualization of RNF8 accumulation at DNA damaged sites.

Authors:  Giovanna Muggiolu; Michal Pomorski; Gérard Claverie; Guillaume Berthet; Christine Mer-Calfati; Samuel Saada; Guillaume Devès; Marina Simon; Hervé Seznec; Philippe Barberet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A mechanistic study of gold nanoparticle radiosensitisation using targeted microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  Mihaela Ghita; Stephen J McMahon; Laura E Taggart; Karl T Butterworth; Giuseppe Schettino; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A simple microscopy setup for visualizing cellular responses to DNA damage at particle accelerator facilities.

Authors:  Haibin Qian; Ron A Hoebe; Michel R Faas; Marc Jan van Goethem; Emiel R van der Graaf; Christoph Meyer; Harry Kiewiet; Sytze Brandenburg; Przemek M Krawczyk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.