Literature DB >> 18039043

Functional magnetic resonance imaging responses relate to differences in real-world social experience.

Naomi I Eisenberger1, Shelly L Gable, Matthew D Lieberman.   

Abstract

Although neuroimaging techniques have proven powerful in assessing neural responses, little is known about whether scanner-based neural activity relates to real-world psychological experience. A joint functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)/experience-sampling study investigated whether individual differences in neurocognitive reactivity to scanner-based social rejection related to: (a) moment-to-moment feelings of social rejection during real-world social interactions ("momentary social distress") and (b) the extent to which these momentary feelings corresponded with end-of-day global assessments of social disconnection ("end-of-day social disconnection"). Individuals who showed greater activity in regions associated with affective and pain processing (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, periaqueductal gray) during scanner-based social rejection reported feeling greater momentary social distress during their daily social interactions. In contrast, individuals who showed greater activity in regions associated with memory and self-referential memory encoding (hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex) showed a stronger correspondence between momentary social distress and end-of-day social disconnection, such that greater momentary social distress was associated with greater end-of-day social disconnection. These findings complement previous work showing a dissociation between momentary and retrospective reports of affect and suggest that these processes rely on dissociable neural systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18039043     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  57 in total

1.  Time spent with friends in adolescence relates to less neural sensitivity to later peer rejection.

Authors:  Carrie L Masten; Eva H Telzer; Andrew J Fuligni; Matthew D Lieberman; Naomi I Eisenberger
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  The neural bases of social pain: evidence for shared representations with physical pain.

Authors:  Naomi I Eisenberger
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  On the importance of knowing your partner's views: attitude familiarity is associated with better interpersonal functioning and lower ambulatory blood pressure in daily life.

Authors:  David M Sanbonmatsu; Bert N Uchino; Wendy Birmingham
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Integrating ecological momentary assessment and functional brain imaging methods: new avenues for studying and treating tobacco dependence.

Authors:  Stephen J Wilson; Joshua M Smyth; Robert R MacLean
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  The push of social pain: Does rejection's sting motivate subsequent social reconnection?

Authors:  David S Chester; C Nathan DeWall; Richard S Pond
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Experiences of Discrimination Are Associated With Greater Resting Amygdala Activity and Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Uraina S Clark; Evan R Miller; Rachal R Hegde
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  Hippocampal contributions to the processing of social emotions.

Authors:  Mary Helen Immordino-Yang; Vanessa Singh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task.

Authors:  Jennifer S Silk; Laura R Stroud; Greg J Siegle; Ronald E Dahl; Kyung Hwa Lee; Eric E Nelson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Measuring neural and behavioral activity during ongoing computerized social interactions: an examination of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Jason R Themanson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Individual Variability in Brain Activity: A Nuisance or an Opportunity?

Authors:  John Darrell Van Horn; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.