Literature DB >> 18038061

Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec.

Nils Chaillet1, Eric Dubé, Marylène Dugas, Diane Francoeur, Johanne Dubé, Sonia Gagnon, Lucie Poitras, Alexandre Dumont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate obstetricians perceptions of clinical practice guidelines targeting management of labour and vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth, and to identify the barriers to, facilitators of and obstetricians solutions for implementing these guidelines in practice.
METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in three hospitals in Montreal that represent around 10% of births in Quebec. Data was collected from 10 focus groups, followed by six semi-structured interviews. Two researchers jointly analysed the verbatim transcripts according to A manual for the use of focus groups.
FINDINGS: The identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of guidelines can be classified into four categories: 1) the hospital level, including management and hospital policies; 2) the departmental level, including local policies, leadership, organizational factors, economic incentive, and availability of equipment and staff; 3) the health professionals motivations and attitudes, including medico-legal concerns, skill levels, acceptance of guidelines and strategies used to implement recommendations; and 4) patients motivations.
CONCLUSION: Identifying the barriers to and facilitators of the adoption of recommendations is an important way to guide the development of efficient strategies. The findings of this study suggest that the adoption of guidelines may be improved if local health professionals perceptions are considered to make recommendations more acceptable and useful. Our findings also support the assumption that obstetricians seek to implement best practices, but require evidence tools and support to assess their practices and enhance their performance. In addition, peer review activities championed by opinion leaders have been identified by obstetricians as the most suitable strategy to improve the use of the guidelines in their practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038061      PMCID: PMC2636490          DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.039289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  16 in total

Review 1.  Getting guidelines into practice: a literature review.

Authors:  Richens Yana; Rycroft-Malone Jo
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2004 Aug 25-31

2.  Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors.

Authors:  Renate M E Häger; Anne K Daltveit; Dag Hofoss; Stein T Nilsen; Toril Kolaas; Pål Øian; Tore Henriksen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas; G MacLennan; C Fraser; C R Ramsay; L Vale; P Whitty; M P Eccles; L Matowe; L Shirran; M Wensing; R Dijkstra; C Donaldson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  The employment of ward opinion leaders for continuing education in the hospital.

Authors:  S W Hong; T Y Ching; J P Fung; W L Seto
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Changing the use of electronic fetal monitoring and labor support: a case study of barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; Barbara Davies; Carl Nimrod
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 6.  How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?

Authors:  Alexander K Rowe; Don de Savigny; Claudio F Lanata; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 17-23       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Appropriate technology for birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia.

Authors:  K O'Driscoll; M Foley; D MacDonald
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  M A Thomson O'Brien; A D Oxman; D A Davis; R B Haynes; N Freemantle; E L Harvey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

10.  Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health: commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Authors:  Debra Bick
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.931

View more
  24 in total

1.  Labor management and mode of delivery among migrant and Spanish women: does the variability reflect differences in obstetric decisions according to ethnic origin?

Authors:  Cristina Bernis; Carlos Varea; Barry Bogin; Antonio González-González
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

2.  First do no harm: interventions during childbirth.

Authors:  Lauren Jansen; Martha Gibson; Betty Carlson Bowles; Jane Leach
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

3.  Maternal and newborn outcomes after a prior cesarean birth by planned mode of delivery and history of prior vaginal birth in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Celeste D Bickford; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

4.  Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice.

Authors:  Maria L Costa; Jose G Cecatti; João P Souza; Helaine M Milanez; Metin A Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method.

Authors:  Rahim Ostovar; Arash Rashidian; Abolghasem Pourreza; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Sedigheh Hantooshzadeh; Hassan Eftekhar Ardebili; Mahmood Mahmoudi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Mode of childbirth in low-risk pregnancies: Nicaraguan physicians' viewpoints.

Authors:  Mercedes Colomar; Maria Luisa Cafferata; Alicia Aleman; Graciela Castellano; Ezequiel Garcia Elorrio; Fernando Althabe; Susheela Engelbrecht
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

7.  Barriers to Implementing Evidence-Based Intrapartum Care: A Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mina Iravani; Mohsen Janghorbani; Ellahe Zarean; Masod Bahrami
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  Developmental evaluation as a strategy to enhance the uptake and use of deprescribing guidelines: protocol for a multiple case study.

Authors:  James Conklin; Barbara Farrell; Natalie Ward; Lisa McCarthy; Hannah Irving; Lalitha Raman-Wilms
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  E L Mc Goldrick; T Crawford; J A Brown; K M Groom; C A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Do Infant Birth Outcomes Vary Among Mothers With and Without Health Insurance Coverage in Sub-Saharan Africa? Findings from the National Health Insurance and Cash and Carry Eras in Ghana, West Africa.

Authors:  Abdallah Ibrahim; Anne Marie O'Keefe
Journal:  Int J MCH AIDS       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.