Literature DB >> 15566342

Changing the use of electronic fetal monitoring and labor support: a case study of barriers and facilitators.

Ian D Graham1, Jo Logan, Barbara Davies, Carl Nimrod.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreasing the use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring and increasing professional labor support for low-risk pregnancies are recommended by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. This study explored factors influencing the successful (and unsuccessful) introduction of an evidence-based fetal health surveillance guideline.
METHODS: This qualitative case study was conducted at two tertiary and one community hospital. Data were collected in 14 clinician focus groups (51 nurses), followed by 8 interviews with nurse administrators and educators. Analysis of verbatim transcripts and unit records included coding and categorizing data to form profiles that were compared across hospitals.
RESULTS: Implementation of the guideline recommendations in the hospital settings was affected by many different factors originating in the practice environment, with the potential adopters, and related to the characteristics of the guideline. The influences of these diverse factors interacted sometimes to magnify or counteract each other's effect. The physical setting, adopter concerns, and the medicolegal issues surrounding the guideline played critical roles in uptake. In addition, changes preceding the introduction of the recommendations, the institution's agenda, and nursing and medical leadership influenced the uptake of guideline recommendations. The number and experience of nurses in each setting and availability of equipment also affected guideline acceptance and use.
CONCLUSIONS: When implementing best practice, it is important to identify organizational barriers to the change that will need managing by the appropriate level of administration in the organization. Careful tailoring of implementation interventions to the barriers originating with the potential adopters is also necessary. Be prepared for unanticipated effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15566342     DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00322.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  15 in total

1.  Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec.

Authors:  Nils Chaillet; Eric Dubé; Marylène Dugas; Diane Francoeur; Johanne Dubé; Sonia Gagnon; Lucie Poitras; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Clinical practice guideline dissemination and a new approach using Haddon matrix as a conceptual framework of evidence-based implementation strategies.

Authors:  Peter Pang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2010

3.  Fetal monitoring: creating a culture of safety with informed choice.

Authors:  Lisa Heelan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

4.  "Entrenched practices and other biases": unpacking the historical, economic, professional, and social resistance to de-implementation.

Authors:  Theresa Montini; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  The effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for promoting evidence-informed decision-making among nurses in tertiary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Yost; Rebecca Ganann; David Thompson; Fazila Aloweni; Kristine Newman; Afeez Hazzan; Ann McKibbon; Maureen Dobbins; Donna Ciliska
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Exploring Professional Support Offered by Midwives during Labour: An Observation and Interview Study.

Authors:  Stina Thorstensson; Anette Ekström; Ingela Lundgren; Elisabeth Hertfelt Wahn
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-12-04

7.  Towards a general theory of implementation.

Authors:  Carl May
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study.

Authors:  Simon Lewin; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-10

9.  Influencing factors for high quality care on postpartum haemorrhage in the Netherlands: patient and professional perspectives.

Authors:  Mallory D Woiski; Evelien Belfroid; Janine Liefers; Richard P Grol; Hubertina C Scheepers; Rosella P Hermens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Knowledge translation strategies for enhancing nurses' evidence-informed decision making: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jennifer Yost; David Thompson; Rebecca Ganann; Fazila Aloweni; Kristine Newman; Ann McKibbon; Maureen Dobbins; Donna Ciliska
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.