Literature DB >> 18037582

Tumor volume changes on 1.5 tesla endorectal MRI during neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy for higher-risk prostate cancer and recurrence in men treated using radiation therapy results of the phase II CALGB 9682 study.

Anthony V D'Amico1, Susan Halabi, Clare Tempany, David Titelbaum, George K Philips, Marian Loffredo, Elizabeth McMahon, Ben Sanford, Nicholas J Vogelzang, Eric J Small.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively determined whether the change in tumor volume (TV) during 2 months of neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy (nAST) measured using conventional 1.5 Tesla endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI) was associated with the risk of recurrence after radiation (RT) and 6 months of AST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2001, 180 men with clinical stage T1c-T3cN0M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were registered. Fifteen were found to be ineligible and the institutional MR radiologist could not assess the TV in 32, leaving 133 for analysis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether a significant association existed between eMRI-defined TV progression during nAST and time to recurrence adjusting for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (8 to 10 or 7 vs. 6 or less) and stage (T3 vs. T1-2).
RESULTS: After a median follow up of 6.7 years and adjusting for known prognostic factors, there was a significant increase in the risk of PSA failure (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.1-4.5; p = 0.025) in men with eMRI-defined TV progression during nAST. Specifically, adjusted estimates of PSA failure were significantly higher (p = 0.032) in men with, compared with men without, eMRI-defined TV progression reaching 38% vs. 19%, respectively, by 5 years.
CONCLUSION: Eradicating intraprostatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) by maximizing local control and randomized trials assessing whether survival is improved when agents active against HRPC are combined with maximal local therapy are needed in men who progress based on eMRI during nAST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037582      PMCID: PMC2976647          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Hedvig Hricak; Michael W Kattan; Hui-Ni Chen; Peter T Scardino; Kentaro Kuroiwa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Assessment of prostate cancer volume using endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging: a new predictor of tumor response to neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; E Chang; M Garnick; P Kantoff; M Jiroutek; C M Tempany
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  MR imaging of the prostate and bladder.

Authors:  D Cheng; C M Tempany
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun Nakashima; Akihiro Tanimoto; Yutaka Imai; Makio Mukai; Yutaka Horiguchi; Ken Nakagawa; Mototsugu Oya; Takashi Ohigashi; Ken Marumo; Masaru Murai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  C M Tempany; X Zhou; E A Zerhouni; M D Rifkin; L E Quint; C W Piccoli; J H Ellis; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Predictors of improved outcome for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen ablation therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; O Lyass; Z Fuks; T Wolfe; C Burman; C C Ling; S A Leibel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Intraprostatic androgens and androgen-regulated gene expression persist after testosterone suppression: therapeutic implications for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elahe A Mostaghel; Stephanie T Page; Daniel W Lin; Ladan Fazli; Ilsa M Coleman; Lawrence D True; Beatrice Knudsen; David L Hess; Colleen C Nelson; Alvin M Matsumoto; William J Bremner; Martin E Gleave; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Cecilia Wassberg; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Prostate cancer: prediction of biochemical failure after external-beam radiation therapy--Kattan nomogram and endorectal MR imaging estimation of tumor volume.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Walter J Koff; Fergus V Coakley; Valdair F Muglia; John M Neuhaus; Ralph T Marcus; John Kurhanewicz; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Low testosterone at first prostate-specific antigen failure and assessment of risk of death in men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer treated on prospective clinical trials.

Authors:  Katelyn M Atkins; Ming-Hui Chen; Jing Wu; Andrew A Renshaw; Marian Loffredo; Philip W Kantoff; Eric J Small; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Semiautomated volumetric response evaluation as an imaging biomarker in superior sulcus tumors.

Authors:  C G Vos; M Dahele; J R van Sörnsen de Koste; S Senan; I Bahce; M A Paul; E Thunnissen; E F Smit; K J Hartemink
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Prostate-specific antigen nadir and testosterone level at prostate-specific antigen failure following radiation and androgen suppression therapy for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer and the risk of all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Danielle S Bitterman; Ming-Hui Chen; Jing Wu; Andrew A Renshaw; Marian Loffredo; Philip W Kantoff; Eric J Small; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 6.921

6.  Long-term results of a phase II study with neoadjuvant docetaxel chemotherapy and complete androgen blockade in locally advanced and high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias M Heck; Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Margitta Retz; Michael Autenrieth; Kathleen Herkommer; Bernd J Krause; Jürgen E Gschwend; Uwe Treiber; Hubert R Kübler
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 17.388

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.