OBJECTIVES: A clinical tool that can reliably assess prostate cancer response to androgen suppression is lacking. This pilot study was designed to identify the potential clinical factor(s) that correlate with tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Twenty-one patients managed with definitive local therapy and neoadjuvant androgen suppression (median 3 months [range 2 to 7]) between 1995 and 1997 comprise the study population. Fisher's exact test was used to test the significance of the proportion of patients with a given clinical factor and the outcome of pathologic organ-confined disease. The clinical factors tested included preoperative prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, months of total androgen suppression, the change in the endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI)-defined stage, the change in erMRI-defined tumor, and the change in the erMRI-defined prostate volume during neoadjuvant androgen suppression. RESULTS: All 21 patients had a decrease in the erMRI-determined prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen during androgen suppression, whereas only 10 of 21 (48%) had a reduction in the erMRI-determined tumor volume. There was a statistically significant increased proportion of patients with a decrease in the erMRI-determined tumor volume (P = 0.008) who had pathologic organ-confined disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that the changes in the erMRI-determined tumor volume occurring during androgen suppression may be predictive of the tumor response. Validation in a larger prospective study is currently underway.
OBJECTIVES: A clinical tool that can reliably assess prostate cancer response to androgen suppression is lacking. This pilot study was designed to identify the potential clinical factor(s) that correlate with tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Twenty-one patients managed with definitive local therapy and neoadjuvant androgen suppression (median 3 months [range 2 to 7]) between 1995 and 1997 comprise the study population. Fisher's exact test was used to test the significance of the proportion of patients with a given clinical factor and the outcome of pathologic organ-confined disease. The clinical factors tested included preoperative prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, months of total androgen suppression, the change in the endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI)-defined stage, the change in erMRI-defined tumor, and the change in the erMRI-defined prostate volume during neoadjuvant androgen suppression. RESULTS: All 21 patients had a decrease in the erMRI-determined prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen during androgen suppression, whereas only 10 of 21 (48%) had a reduction in the erMRI-determined tumor volume. There was a statistically significant increased proportion of patients with a decrease in the erMRI-determined tumor volume (P = 0.008) who had pathologic organ-confined disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that the changes in the erMRI-determined tumor volume occurring during androgen suppression may be predictive of the tumor response. Validation in a larger prospective study is currently underway.
Authors: Mark Thalgott; Brigitte Rack; Tobias Maurer; Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Veronika Kreß; Matthias M Heck; Ulrich Andergassen; Roman Nawroth; Jürgen E Gschwend; Margitta Retz Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Anthony V D'Amico; Susan Halabi; Clare Tempany; David Titelbaum; George K Philips; Marian Loffredo; Elizabeth McMahon; Ben Sanford; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Eric J Small Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 7.038