Literature DB >> 17510436

Intraprostatic androgens and androgen-regulated gene expression persist after testosterone suppression: therapeutic implications for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Elahe A Mostaghel1, Stephanie T Page, Daniel W Lin, Ladan Fazli, Ilsa M Coleman, Lawrence D True, Beatrice Knudsen, David L Hess, Colleen C Nelson, Alvin M Matsumoto, William J Bremner, Martin E Gleave, Peter S Nelson.   

Abstract

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer. The efficacy of ADT has not been rigorously evaluated by demonstrating suppression of prostatic androgen activity at the target tissue and molecular level. We determined the efficacy and consistency of medical castration in suppressing prostatic androgen levels and androgen-regulated gene expression. Androgen levels and androgen-regulated gene expression (by microarray profiling, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunohistochemistry) were measured in prostate samples from a clinical trial of short-term castration (1 month) using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, Acyline, versus placebo in healthy men. To assess the effects of long-term ADT, gene expression measurements were evaluated at baseline and after 3, 6, and 9 months of neoadjuvant ADT in prostatectomy samples from men with localized prostate cancer. Medical castration reduced tissue androgens by 75% and reduced the expression of several androgen-regulated genes (NDRG1, FKBP5, and TMPRSS2). However, many androgen-responsive genes, including the androgen receptor (AR) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), were not suppressed after short-term castration or after 9 months of neoadjuvant ADT. Significant heterogeneity in PSA and AR protein expression was observed in prostate cancer samples at each time point of ADT. Medical castration based on serum testosterone levels cannot be equated with androgen ablation in the prostate microenvironment. Standard androgen deprivation does not consistently suppress androgen-dependent gene expression. Suboptimal suppression of tumoral androgen activity may lead to adaptive cellular changes allowing prostate cancer cell survival in a low androgen environment. Optimal clinical efficacy will require testing of novel approaches targeting complete suppression of systemic and intracrine contributions to the prostatic androgen microenvironment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17510436     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  210 in total

1.  Phase II study of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer displaying bone flare discordant with serologic response.

Authors:  Charles J Ryan; Shreya Shah; Eleni Efstathiou; Matthew R Smith; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Glenn J Bubley; Christopher J Logothetis; Thian Kheoh; Christine Kilian; Christopher M Haqq; Arturo Molina; Eric J Small
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Adrenal androgens rescue prostatic dihydrotestosterone production and growth of prostate cancer cells after castration.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Li Tang; Gissou Azabdaftari; Elena Pop; Gary J Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Catherine A Foss; Youngjoo Byun; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; George Sgouros; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Guidelines for the management of castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Sebastien J Hotte
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone inhibit growth of androgen-independent prostate cancer through inactivation of ERK and Akt kinases.

Authors:  Ferenc G Rick; Andrew V Schally; Luca Szalontay; Norman L Block; Karoly Szepeshazi; Mehrdad Nadji; Marta Zarandi; Florian Hohla; Stefan Buchholz; Stephan Seitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  CYP17 polymorphisms and prostate cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Erika M Kwon; Daniel W Lin; Suzanne Kolb; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Ziding Feng; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Targeted androgen pathway suppression in localized prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Paul Lange; Daniel W Lin; Mary Ellen Taplin; Steven Balk; William Ellis; Philip Kantoff; Brett Marck; Daniel Tamae; Alvin M Matsumoto; Lawrence D True; Robert Vessella; Trevor Penning; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Roman Gulati; Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  FOXO1 binds to the TAU5 motif and inhibits constitutively active androgen receptor splice variants.

Authors:  Laura R Bohrer; Ping Liu; Jian Zhong; Yunqian Pan; James Angstman; Lucas J Brand; Scott M Dehm; Haojie Huang
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 9.  Concept and viability of androgen annihilation for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  James L Mohler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A comparison of prostate cancer cell transcriptomes in 2D monoculture vs 3D xenografts identify consistent gene expression alterations associated with tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Lauren Brady; Rui M Gil da Costa; Ilsa M Coleman; Clinton K Matson; Michael C Risk; Roger T Coleman; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.