BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorders (BD) have a strong genetic underpinning, yet no biological vulnerability markers for BD have been identified. Decreased volumes of subgenual cingulate (SGC) were replicated in familial bipolar patients. Presence of abnormality in unaffected subjects at genetic risk for an illness needs to be established before SGC volumes can be used as an endophenotype. This is the first study of SGC volumes in affected and unaffected subjects at familial risk for mood disorders. METHOD: High-risk participants were recruited from families multiply affected with BD. The high-risk sample included 13 affected and 13 unaffected offspring of bipolar I parents, who were matched by age and sex with 31 controls without a personal or family history of psychiatric disorders. The expanded sample consisted of 24 unaffected, 19 affected subjects all with a first or second degree relative suffering from BD I or II. The age range for all subjects was 15-30 years. Subgenual cingulate volumes were measured on 1.5 T 3D anatomical MRI images using standard methods. RESULTS: We found comparable SGC volumes among unaffected, affected offspring of BD I parents and controls. Likewise no SGC abnormalities were found in the expanded sample of subjects with BD I or II relatives. Left SGC volumes in all groups were smaller than right SGC volumes without laterality by group interaction. The exclusion of 5 medicated subjects did not change the results. LIMITATIONS: Cross sectional design, inclusion of both bipolar I and bipolar II probands. CONCLUSIONS: Subgenual cingulate volume abnormalities were absent in unaffected or affected relatives of bipolar patients and thus did not meet criteria for endophenotype.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar disorders (BD) have a strong genetic underpinning, yet no biological vulnerability markers for BD have been identified. Decreased volumes of subgenual cingulate (SGC) were replicated in familial bipolarpatients. Presence of abnormality in unaffected subjects at genetic risk for an illness needs to be established before SGC volumes can be used as an endophenotype. This is the first study of SGC volumes in affected and unaffected subjects at familial risk for mood disorders. METHOD: High-risk participants were recruited from families multiply affected with BD. The high-risk sample included 13 affected and 13 unaffected offspring of bipolar I parents, who were matched by age and sex with 31 controls without a personal or family history of psychiatric disorders. The expanded sample consisted of 24 unaffected, 19 affected subjects all with a first or second degree relative suffering from BD I or II. The age range for all subjects was 15-30 years. Subgenual cingulate volumes were measured on 1.5 T 3D anatomical MRI images using standard methods. RESULTS: We found comparable SGC volumes among unaffected, affected offspring of BD I parents and controls. Likewise no SGC abnormalities were found in the expanded sample of subjects with BD I or II relatives. Left SGC volumes in all groups were smaller than right SGC volumes without laterality by group interaction. The exclusion of 5 medicated subjects did not change the results. LIMITATIONS: Cross sectional design, inclusion of both bipolar I and bipolar II probands. CONCLUSIONS: Subgenual cingulate volume abnormalities were absent in unaffected or affected relatives of bipolar patients and thus did not meet criteria for endophenotype.
Authors: R D Todd; W Reich; T A Petti; P Joshi; J R DePaulo; J Nurnberger; T Reich Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Y Hirayasu; M E Shenton; D F Salisbury; J S Kwon; C G Wible; I A Fischer; D Yurgelun-Todd; C Zarate; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; R W McCarley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Molly E Zimmerman; Melissa P DelBello; Glen E Getz; Paula K Shear; Stephen M Strakowski Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: J Douglas Bremner; Meena Vythilingam; Eric Vermetten; Ahsan Nazeer; Jahangir Adil; Sarfraz Khan; Lawrence H Staib; Dennis S Charney Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Manon Hj Hillegers; Catrien G Reichart; Marjolein Wals; Frank C Verhulst; Johan Ormel; Willem A Nolen Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Marsal Sanches; Roberto B Sassi; David Axelson; Mark Nicoletti; Paolo Brambilla; John P Hatch; Matcheri S Keshavan; Neal D Ryan; Boris Birmaher; Jair C Soares Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2005-01-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Matthew J Kempton; Morgan Haldane; Jigar Jogia; Paul M Grasby; David Collier; Sophia Frangou Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Isabelle E Bauer; Marsal Sanches; Robert Suchting; Charles E Green; Nadia M El Fangary; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; Jair C Soares Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Tomas Hajek; Jeffrey Cullis; Tomas Novak; Miloslav Kopecek; Ryan Blagdon; Lukas Propper; Pavla Stopkova; Anne Duffy; Cyril Hoschl; Rudolf Uher; Tomas Paus; L Trevor Young; Martin Alda Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Theo G M van Erp; Paul M Thompson; Tuula Kieseppä; Carrie E Bearden; Alexandria C Marino; Gil D Hoftman; Jari Haukka; Timo Partonen; Matti Huttunen; Jaakko Kaprio; Jouko Lönnqvist; Veli-Pekka Poutanen; Arthur W Toga; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Anne Duffy; Tomas Hajek; Martin Alda; Paul Grof; Robert Milin; Glenda MacQueen Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 5.270