INTRODUCTION: Cognitive deficits, including deficits in early information processing, are associated with remitted bipolar disorder. The temporal relationship between these deficits and the clinical course is not known. The current study investigated whether or not deficits in early information processing were present before the onset and/or during the early stages of bipolar disorder. METHODS: Unaffected and remitted high risk offspring of well-characterized bipolar parents completed a visual backward masking task. For comparison we included a cohort of unaffected offspring of well parents and a clinically referred group of remitted bipolar patients. RESULTS: There was no evidence of a deficit in early information processing in well high risk subjects. As expected, the referred patient group had the highest error rates. After excluding the patients, interaction effect showed that the affected remitted high risk subjects performed differently in terms of error rates than unaffected high risk and control subjects. There were no significant differences in response times across study groups. Exploratory analyses revealed an association between a lifetime history of psychosis and increased errors on the task. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a vulnerability in early information processing in offspring at risk for bipolar disorder. However, there were emergent changes in performance in the affected remitted high risk group. Psychosis appears to be an important clinical correlate associated with cognitive deficits. Mapping of the early course of bipolar disorder and associated changes in cognition has important implications for establishing critical periods for intervention.
INTRODUCTION:Cognitive deficits, including deficits in early information processing, are associated with remitted bipolar disorder. The temporal relationship between these deficits and the clinical course is not known. The current study investigated whether or not deficits in early information processing were present before the onset and/or during the early stages of bipolar disorder. METHODS: Unaffected and remitted high risk offspring of well-characterized bipolar parents completed a visual backward masking task. For comparison we included a cohort of unaffected offspring of well parents and a clinically referred group of remitted bipolarpatients. RESULTS: There was no evidence of a deficit in early information processing in well high risk subjects. As expected, the referred patient group had the highest error rates. After excluding the patients, interaction effect showed that the affected remitted high risk subjects performed differently in terms of error rates than unaffected high risk and control subjects. There were no significant differences in response times across study groups. Exploratory analyses revealed an association between a lifetime history of psychosis and increased errors on the task. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a vulnerability in early information processing in offspring at risk for bipolar disorder. However, there were emergent changes in performance in the affected remitted high risk group. Psychosis appears to be an important clinical correlate associated with cognitive deficits. Mapping of the early course of bipolar disorder and associated changes in cognition has important implications for establishing critical periods for intervention.
Authors: Martin Alda; Paul Grof; Guy A Rouleau; Gustavo Turecki; L Trevor Young Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Robin M Murray; Pak Sham; Jim Van Os; Jolanta Zanelli; Mary Cannon; Colm McDonald Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Anne Duffy; Martin Alda; Stan Kutcher; Patrizia Cavazzoni; Carrie Robertson; Eva Grof; Paul Grof Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Caroline L Vandeleur; Marie-Pierre F Strippoli; Enrique Castelao; Mehdi Gholam-Rezaee; François Ferrero; Pierre Marquet; Jean-Michel Aubry; Martin Preisig Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Carol Jahshan; Jonathan K Wynn; Amanda McCleery; David C Glahn; Lori L Altshuler; Michael F Green Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Gisela Sugranyes; Elena de la Serna; Roger Borras; Vanessa Sanchez-Gistau; Jose C Pariente; Soledad Romero; Inmaculada Baeza; Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja; Elisa Rodriguez-Toscano; Carmen Moreno; Miguel Bernardo; Dolores Moreno; Eduard Vieta; Josefina Castro-Fornieles Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 9.306