Literature DB >> 18035622

Retrieval-based illusory recollections: why study-test contextual changes impair source memory.

Chad S Dodson1.   

Abstract

Illusory source recollections can be manufactured purely by the conditions at retrieval. At encoding, individuals listened to words spoken by a male or a female voice and later, at retrieval, determined who initially had spoken the test word or whether it was a new word. In Experiment 1, individuals were instructed during the memory test to make a response of male or female only if they clearly recollected the speaker presenting the item during encoding and to respond don't remember otherwise. Presenting test words with the same voice (match condition) as the one that had presented the word at encoding, a different voice (mismatch condition), or no test voice had no effect on the rate of responding don't remember. Instead, matching and mismatching test voices created illusory recollections that were consistent with the test voice. Experiment 2 yielded similar results with a remember/know source test. In this article, a theory is proposed that explains the illusory recollection effects, and a multinomial model and procedure are used to separate and measure the contributions of source discrimination and illusory recollections to performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035622     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  Context-dependent recognition memory: the ICE theory.

Authors:  K Murnane; M P Phelps; K Malmberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-12

2.  Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.

Authors:  S A Dewhurst; G J Hitch
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1999-03

3.  Memory for multidimensional source information.

Authors:  Thorsten Meiser; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Source attributions and false memories: a test of the demand characteristics account.

Authors:  J M Lampinen; J S Neuschatz; D G Payne
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

Review 5.  The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 6.  The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Scott D Slotnick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

Authors:  K Murnane; U J Bayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  A demonstration and comparison of two types of inference-based memory errors.

Authors:  S L Hannigan; M T Reinitz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory.

Authors:  D L Schacter; K A Norman; W Koutstaal
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

View more
  4 in total

1.  Electromyographic evidence for response conflict in the exclude recognition task.

Authors:  Travis L Seymour; Eric H Schumacher
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Perceptual difficulty in source memory encoding and retrieval: prefrontal versus parietal electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Trudy Y Kuo; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  False memory susceptibility in coma survivors with and without a near-death experience.

Authors:  Charlotte Martial; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Hedwige Dehon; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-16

4.  Internal reinstatement hides cuing effects in source memory tasks.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.