Literature DB >> 15450167

The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion.

Daniel L Schacter1, Scott D Slotnick.   

Abstract

Memory distortion occurs in the laboratory and in everyday life. This article focuses on false recognition, a common type of memory distortion in which individuals incorrectly claim to have encountered a novel object or event. By considering evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging, and electrophysiology, we address three questions. (1) Are there patterns of neural activity that can distinguish between true and false recognition? (2) Which brain regions contribute to false recognition? (3) Which brain regions play a role in monitoring or reducing false recognition? Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies suggest that sensory activity is greater for true recognition compared to false recognition. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging results indicate that the hippocampus and several cortical regions contribute to false recognition. Evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging, and electrophysiology implicates the prefrontal cortex in retrieval monitoring that can limit the rate of false recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15450167     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  72 in total

Review 1.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline.

Authors:  Thomas R Insel; Remi Quirion
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring.

Authors:  Benton H Pierce; David A Gallo; Jonathan A Weiss; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

4.  False recognition of incidentally learned pictures and words in primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Emily Rogalski; Diana Blum; Alfred Rademaker; Sandra Weintraub
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Retrieval-based illusory recollections: why study-test contextual changes impair source memory.

Authors:  Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

Authors:  Rachel J Garoff-Eaton; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Conceptual fluency at test shifts recognition response bias in Alzheimer's disease: implications for increased false recognition.

Authors:  Carl A Gold; Natalie L Marchant; Wilma Koutstaal; Daniel L Schacter; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  False beliefs about fattening foods can have healthy consequences.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Cara Laney; Erin K Morris; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The cortical underpinnings of context-based memory distortion.

Authors:  Elissa Aminoff; Daniel L Schacter; Moshe Bar
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Age-related neural changes during memory conjunction errors.

Authors:  Kelly S Giovanello; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Alana T Wong; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.