Literature DB >> 10645376

Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.

S A Dewhurst1, G J Hitch.   

Abstract

The difficulty of the cognitive operations required to process study items was manipulated in two experiments investigating recollective experience. In subsequent recognition tests, subjects indicated whether their recognition judgements for items processed in these tasks were based on recollection ("remember" responses) or on familiarity ("know" responses). In Experiment 1 target items were presented in the context of a category decision task. It was found that remember responses increased with the difficulty of the category decision. For positive instances, remember responses were greater for items of low instance frequency than for items of high instance frequency, while for negative instances remember responses were greater for items from similar categories than for items from dissimilar categories. These effects were not present in know responses. In Experiment 2, remember responses were more frequent when study items had been presented in the form of anagrams to be solved than when they had been presented in the form of words to be read aloud. The incidence of know responses was not affected by the format in which study items were presented. Source judgements were also more accurate when recognition was based on recollection. It is argued that the type of conscious awareness experienced during recognition is determined by the knowledge activated by items presented in the recognition test, which in turn is determined by the nature of the operations engaged at encoding.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10645376     DOI: 10.1080/741944067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  10 in total

1.  Effects of exact and category repetition in true and false recognition memory.

Authors:  S A Dewhurst; S J Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Karen R Brandt; Melanie S Sharp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

Review 3.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

4.  Retrieval-based illusory recollections: why study-test contextual changes impair source memory.

Authors:  Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

5.  Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  Source memory in adolescents and adults with Asperger's syndrome.

Authors:  Dermot M Bowler; John M Gardiner; Natasha Berthollier
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2004-10

7.  Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: a principal components analysis.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Dennis C Hay; Lee H V Wickham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

8.  A little elaboration goes a long way: the role of generation in eyewitness suggestibility.

Authors:  Sean M Lane; Maria S Zaragoza
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

9.  Not all repetition is alike: different benefits of repetition in amnesia and normal memory.

Authors:  Mieke Verfaellie; Suparna Rajaram; Karen Fossum; Lisa Williams
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  The benefits of mystery in nature on attention: assessing the impacts of presentation duration.

Authors:  Andrew M Szolosi; Jason M Watson; Edward J Ruddell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.