| Literature DB >> 21695457 |
Abstract
Today, one can hardly imagine the medical daily routine without computer-assisted systems, although their benefit usually is not investigated by prospective randomised trials. While in the industrial working environment computer-assisted systems are thoroughly accepted because of their precision and endurance, in medicine there are fierce debates about their use at considerably high costs. At least the perioperative advantages (e.g. less blood loss, shorter period of hospitalization), to a large extent, are beyond dispute. The high costs may be compensated by a higher volume of treated patients. Only the treatment of a higher volume of patients will lead to a reduction of infrastructure costs per case. On the other hand, only a large number of cases ensure the achievement of skills to handle such a complex system. This, in return, reduces the chance of the occurrence of complications and shorter operation times will lead to economic advantages.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21695457 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2543-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urologe A ISSN: 0340-2592 Impact factor: 0.639