Literature DB >> 18035391

Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates.

Hyung-Sool Lee1, Prathap Parameswaran, Andrew Kato-Marcus, César I Torres, Bruce E Rittmann.   

Abstract

We established the first complete electron-equivalent balances in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with non-fermentable (acetate) and fermentable (glucose) electron donors by experimentally quantifying current, biomass, residual organic compounds, H(2), and CH(4) gas. The comparison of the two donors allowed us to objectively evaluate the diversion of electron flow to non-electricity sinks for fermentable donors, leading to different behaviors in energy-conversion efficiency (ECE) and potential efficiency (PE). Electrical current was the most significant electron sink in both MFCs, being 71% and 49%, respectively, of the initial COD applied. Biomass and residual organic compounds, the second and third greatest sinks, respectively, were greater in the glucose-fed MFC than in the acetate-fed MFC. We detected methane gas only in the glucose-fed MFC, and this means that anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) could out-compete acetoclastic methanogens. The ECE was 42% with acetate, but was only 3% with glucose. The very low ECE for glucose was mostly due to a large increase of the anode potential, giving a PE of only 6%. Although the glucose-fed MFC had the higher biomass density on its anode, it had a very low current density, which supports the fact that the density of ARB was very low. This led to slow kinetics for electron transfer to the anode and accentuated loss due to the substrate-concentration gradient in the anode-biofilm. The large drop of PE with low current, probably caused by a low ARB density and electron (e(-)) donor concentration, resulted in a poor maximum power density (9.8mW/m(2)) with glucose. In contrast, PE reached 59% along with high current for acetate and the maximum power density was 360mW/m(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035391     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  22 in total

Review 1.  In situ to in silico and back: elucidating the physiology and ecology of Geobacter spp. using genome-scale modelling.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Sokhee Jung; John M Regan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evaluating biochemical methane production from brewer's spent yeast.

Authors:  Ornella Sosa-Hernández; Prathap Parameswaran; Gibrán Sidney Alemán-Nava; César I Torres; Roberto Parra-Saldívar
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Electron flux and microbial community in microbial fuel cells (open-circuit and closed-circuit modes) and fermentation.

Authors:  Jaecheul Yu; Youghyun Park; Taeho Lee
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Low-potential respirators support electricity production in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  André Grüning; Nelli J Beecroft; Claudio Avignone-Rossa
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Electrochemical techniques for evaluating short-chain fatty acid utilization by bioanodes.

Authors:  Wendy Huang; Younggy Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  High Biofilm Conductivity Maintained Despite Anode Potential Changes in a Geobacter-Enriched Biofilm.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Hodon Ryu; Hao Ren; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Junkseck Chae; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.928

8.  Purification and characterization of OmcZ, an outer-surface, octaheme c-type cytochrome essential for optimal current production by Geobacter sulfurreducens.

Authors:  Kengo Inoue; Xinlei Qian; Leonor Morgado; Byoung-Chan Kim; Tünde Mester; Mounir Izallalen; Carlos A Salgueiro; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Generation of electricity and analysis of microbial communities in wheat straw biomass-powered microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhang; Booki Min; Liping Huang; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Bioelectrochemical treatment of real-field bagasse-based paper mill wastewater in dual-chambered microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Elangovan Elakkiya; Subramaniapillai Niju
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.