Literature DB >> 18034286

Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics--basics and clinical application.

Heiner Wehrbein1, Peter Göllner.   

Abstract

This review article describes the basics and clinical applications of skeletal anchorage in orthodontics, namely: areas of indication, anchorage devices, insertion areas, indications, potential complications, and their use in growing patients. The areas for skeletal anchorage include orthodontic-prosthetic anchorage, orthodontic anchorage, and skeletal anchorage in orthopedic therapy procedures. The anchorage devices currently available are: prosthetic implants, mini screws, palatal implants, onplants, bone anchors, zygoma wires and skeletally-supported distractors. The insertion areas described so far (according to therapeutic procedure and bone supply available) include edentulous jaw sections, the interdental septum, infra-apical and supra-apical areas, the palate (median, paramedian, lateral), the retromolar area, and the zygomatic bone. Force systems are applied (direct or indirect anchorage) according to surgical and orthodontic or orthopedic requirements. Skeletal anchorage devices should be selected according to the following criteria. Is the anchorage task unifunctional or multifunctional? How many anchorage devices are required for the therapy in question? What is the success rate of the various anchorage devices; what are the applicable biomechanics and soft tissue or hard tissue conditions in the insertion area? The success rates for miniscrews are currently between 80% and 90%, and over 90% for palatal implants. The potential of skeletal anchorage is broadening the current orthodontic treatment spectrum, guaranteeing the practitioner absolute control of anchorage by avoiding the unpredictable reactions of periodontal anchorage, leading to a reduction in unwanted side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18034286     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0725-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  19 in total

1.  Bone condition of the maxillary zygomatic process prior to orthodontic anchorage plate fixation.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Skeletal anchorage for everybody? a questionnaire study on frequency of use and clinical indications in daily practice.

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Spectrum of indications for palatal implants in treatment concepts involving immediate and conventional loading.

Authors:  Britta A Jung; Winfried Harzer; Tomasz Gedrange; Martin Kunkel; Maximilian Moergel; Peter Diedrich; Gabriele Lüdicke; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Direct versus indirect loading of orthodontic miniscrew implants-an FEM analysis.

Authors:  C Holberg; P Winterhalder; N Holberg; I Rudzki-Janson; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Orthodontic space closure after first molar extraction without skeletal anchorage.

Authors:  Collin Jacobs; Claudia Jacobs-Müller; Carolin Luley; Christina Erbe; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Mustafa Ayubi; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 7.  Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefan Hoffmann; Nikolaos Papadopoulos; Dominik Visel; Theresa Visel; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Thomas Michael Präger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Long-term effects of traumatic injuries to incisors and periodontal tissues during childhood: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Susanne Wriedt; Monika Martin; Bilal Al-Nawas; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Patient expectations, acceptance and preferences in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants. A randomly controlled study. Part I: insertion techniques.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Stability comparison between commercially available mini-implants and a novel design: part 1.

Authors:  Christine Hong; Haofu Lee; Richard Webster; Jinny Kwak; Benjamin M Wu; Won Moon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.