INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the normal pituitary gland in male subjects with ultrashort echo time (TE) pulse sequences, describe its appearance and measure its signal intensity before and after contrast enhancement. METHODS: Eleven male volunteers (mean age 57.1 years; range 36-81 years) were examined with a fat-suppressed ultrashort TE (=0.08 ms) pulse sequence. The studies were repeated after the administration of intravenous gadodiamide. The MR scans were examined for gland morphology and signal intensity before and after enhancement. Endocrinological evaluation included baseline pituitary function tests and a glucagon stimulatory test to assess pituitary cortisol and growth hormone reserve. RESULTS: High signal intensity was observed in the anterior pituitary relative to the brain in nine of the 11 subjects. These regions involved the whole of the anterior pituitary in three subjects, were localised to one side in two examples and were seen inferiorly in three subjects. Signal intensities relative to the brain increased with age, with a peak around the sixth or seventh decade and decreasing thereafter. Overall, the pituitary function tests were considered to be within normal limits and did not correlate with pituitary gland signal intensity. CONCLUSION: The anterior pituitary shows increased signal intensity in normal subjects when examined with T(1)-weighted ultrashort TE pulse sequences. The cause of this increased intensity is unknown, but fibrosis and iron deposition are possible candidates. The variation in signal intensity with age followed the temporal pattern of iron content observed at post mortem. No relationship with endocrine status was observed.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the normal pituitary gland in male subjects with ultrashort echo time (TE) pulse sequences, describe its appearance and measure its signal intensity before and after contrast enhancement. METHODS: Eleven male volunteers (mean age 57.1 years; range 36-81 years) were examined with a fat-suppressed ultrashort TE (=0.08 ms) pulse sequence. The studies were repeated after the administration of intravenous gadodiamide. The MR scans were examined for gland morphology and signal intensity before and after enhancement. Endocrinological evaluation included baseline pituitary function tests and a glucagon stimulatory test to assess pituitary cortisol and growth hormone reserve. RESULTS: High signal intensity was observed in the anterior pituitary relative to the brain in nine of the 11 subjects. These regions involved the whole of the anterior pituitary in three subjects, were localised to one side in two examples and were seen inferiorly in three subjects. Signal intensities relative to the brain increased with age, with a peak around the sixth or seventh decade and decreasing thereafter. Overall, the pituitary function tests were considered to be within normal limits and did not correlate with pituitary gland signal intensity. CONCLUSION: The anterior pituitary shows increased signal intensity in normal subjects when examined with T(1)-weighted ultrashort TE pulse sequences. The cause of this increased intensity is unknown, but fibrosis and iron deposition are possible candidates. The variation in signal intensity with age followed the temporal pattern of iron content observed at post mortem. No relationship with endocrine status was observed.
Authors: M I Argyropoulou; Z Metafratzi; D N Kiortsis; S Bitsis; A Tsatsoulis; S Efremidis Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: R D Caruso; A E Rosenbaum; R G Sherry; J J Wasenko; S E Joy; L Hochhauser; J K Chang Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 1998 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: J L Dietemann; J M Reimund; R L Diniz; M Reis; R Baumann; C Neugroschl; S Von Söhsten; J M Warter Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Diane M Renz; Horst K Hahn; Peter Schmidt; Jan Rexilius; Markus Lentschig; Alexander Pfeil; Dieter Sauner; Clemens Fitzek; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Werner A Kaiser; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Joachim Böttcher Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 2.804