Literature DB >> 8427074

Sellar susceptibility artifacts: theory and implications.

A D Elster1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and physical basis of a specific form of MR susceptibility artifact that may be seen in the pituitary gland near the junction of sellar floor and sphenoidal septum.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coronal, T1-weighted MR images of the pituitary glands in 50 subjects without clinical evidence of pituitary or sphenoidal sinus disease were reviewed to determine the prevalence of a focal susceptibility artifact near the sellar floor. A plexiglass phantom was constructed to duplicate this artifact in vitro, the appearance of which was studied by varying the direction and intensity of the readout gradient.
RESULTS: In the clinical studies, a focal artifact larger than 1 mm2 was observed in MR studies of seven (14%) of 50 subjects and was sufficiently large to mask or mimic pathology in all cases. The location of this artifact was always within the pituitary gland but closely related to the junction of the sphenoidal septum and sellar floor. The artifact was successfully reproduced in the phantom, and its magnitude was shown to be linearly related to the strength and direction of the readout gradient. An explanation for the focal nature and shape of this artifact is presented based on consideration of the boundary conditions of the Maxwell equations of electromagnetism.
CONCLUSION: A focal susceptibility artifact may be seen on MR images of the pituitary gland closely related to the junction between the sellar floor and sphenoidal septum that may mimic or obscure a microadenoma.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8427074      PMCID: PMC8334436     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in Cushing's disease.

Authors:  Giovanni Vitale; Fabio Tortora; Roberto Baldelli; Francesco Cocchiara; Rosa Maria Paragliola; Emilia Sbardella; Chiara Simeoli; Ferdinando Caranci; Rosario Pivonello; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them.

Authors:  Alfred Stadler; Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Joachim Kettenbach; Edith Eisenhuber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal pituitary gland using ultrashort TE (UTE) pulse sequences (REV 1.0).

Authors:  Olivia Portman; Stephen Flemming; Jeremy P D Cox; Desmond G Johnston; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurement of internal deformation of vibrating vocal fold models.

Authors:  Cassandra J Taylor; Grayson J Tarbox; Bradley D Bolster; Neal K Bangerter; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Assessment of MR imaging during one-lung flooding in a large animal model.

Authors:  Frank Wolfram; Daniel Güllmar; Joachim Böttcher; Harald Schubert; Sabine Bischoff; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Thomas Günther Lesser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  3D-FT thin sections MRI of prolactin-secreting pituitary microadenomas.

Authors:  N Girard; T Brue; V Chabert-Orsini; C Raybaud; P Jaquet; M Poncet; F Grisoli; S Cahen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Assessment of pituitary micro-lesions using 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yue Wu; Zhenwei Yao; Zhong Yang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Limitations of Resting-State Functional MR Imaging in the Setting of Focal Brain Lesions.

Authors:  Shruti Agarwal; Haris I Sair; Jay J Pillai
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.264

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.