Literature DB >> 18033808

Lifetime prevalence of infertility and infertility treatment in the UK: results from a population-based survey of reproduction.

L Oakley1, P Doyle, N Maconochie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of infertility and the use of infertility treatment among women aged 40-55 years.
METHODS: Population-based postal questionnaire survey of UK women. Over 60,000 women randomly sampled from the 2001 electoral roll were sent a questionnaire, and those aged 55 years and under who had ever been pregnant or tried to achieve a pregnancy (n = 6584) were asked to provide a reproductive history.
RESULTS: Overall, 2.4% of women aged 40-55 years had unresolved infertility with no pregnancies, and a further 1.9% had been pregnant but not achieved a live birth. The prevalence of unresolved fertility did not differ among birth cohorts. Sixteen percent of women reported ever consulting a doctor because of infertility and 8% reported receiving treatment to conceive. Across the whole sample, 4.2% of women reported that they had achieved at least one pregnancy as a result of treatment. Compared with earlier birth cohorts, women born later were more likely to report consultations (18% versus 13%) and treatment (9% versus 6%) for infertility, and pregnancies as a result of infertility treatment (6.7% versus 2.7%). Among those who reported medical consultations, women born more recently first consulted at a later age compared with those born earlier.
CONCLUSIONS: Although both the number of women seeking medical care for infertility and the proportion reporting pregnancies as a result of infertility treatment has increased, there is no evidence to support an overall increase in unresolved infertility over the past 15 years. The vast majority of women aged 40-55 who reported difficulties conceiving did have a child, or children, at some point in their lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18033808     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  The use of complementary and alternative fertility treatment in couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective cohort in the United States.

Authors:  James F Smith; Michael L Eisenberg; Susan G Millstein; Robert D Nachtigall; Alan W Shindel; Holly Wing; Marcelle Cedars; Lauri Pasch; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Open Access Tubal aSsessment for the initial management of infertility in general practice (the OATS trial): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Scott Wilkes; Alison Murdoch; Nick Steen; John Wilsdon; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Misconceptions about falling sperm counts and fertility in Europe.

Authors:  Egbert R te Velde; Jens Peter Bonde
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States.

Authors:  James F Smith; Michael L Eisenberg; David Glidden; Susan G Millstein; Marcelle Cedars; Thomas J Walsh; Jonathan Showstack; Lauri A Pasch; Nancy Adler; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Medically assisted reproduction and the risk of preterm birth: a case-control study using data from the Quebec Pregnancy Cohort.

Authors:  Jessica Gorgui; Odile Sheehy; Jacquetta Trasler; William Fraser; Anick Bérard
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-03-19

6.  Fertility treatments and outcomes among couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective fertility cohort in the United States.

Authors:  James F Smith; Michael L Eisenberg; Susan G Millstein; Robert D Nachtigall; Natalia Sadetsky; Marcelle I Cedars; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Sexual, marital, and social impact of a man's perceived infertility diagnosis.

Authors:  James F Smith; Thomas J Walsh; Alan W Shindel; Paul J Turek; Holly Wing; Lauri Pasch; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Reproductive health of women electing bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Gabriella G Gosman; Wendy C King; Beth Schrope; Kristine J Steffen; Gladys W Strain; Anita P Courcoulas; David R Flum; John R Pender; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Methods for a Retrospective Population-based and Clinic-based Subfertility Cohort Study: the Fertility Experiences Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Ahmad Hammoud; Mark Gibson; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Cognitive development following ART: effect of choice of comparison group, confounding and mediating factors.

Authors:  C Carson; J J Kurinczuk; A Sacker; Y Kelly; R Klemetti; M Redshaw; M A Quigley
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.