OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between number of fertility treatment cycles and pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight community and academic infertility practices. PATIENT(S): Four hundred eight (408) couples presenting for an infertility evaluation. INTERVENTION(S): Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of pregnancy. Cox regression analysis compared the efficacy of cycle-based fertility treatments with no cycle-based fertility treatment after multivariable adjustment. RESULT(S): Couples using one to two medications-only cycles had a significantly higher pregnancy rate (hazard ratio [HR] 4.7 [95% confidence interval 1.3-16.6]), a benefit that did not persist after three or more cycles (HR 0.6 [0.1-3.2]). Couples using IUI for one (HR 2.9 [1.4-5.8]), two (HR 2.0 [0.9-4.5]), and three cycles (HR 4.5 [1.8-10.9]) were more likely to achieve a pregnancy. No additional benefit was seen for couples using four or more IUI cycles (HR 1.0 [0.4-2.6]). In vitro fertilization was associated with significant benefit for couples using one (HR 2.8 [1.5-5.2]) and two cycles (HR 2.2 [1.2-4.1]). Couples using three or more IVF cycles had a non-statistically significant higher likelihood of pregnancy (HR 1.3 [0.7-2.4]). CONCLUSION(S): Cycle-based fertility treatments may offer a point of diminishing returns for infertile couples: two cycles of medications only, three cycles of IUI, and two cycles of IVF.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between number of fertility treatment cycles and pregnancy rates. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight community and academic infertility practices. PATIENT(S): Four hundred eight (408) couples presenting for an infertility evaluation. INTERVENTION(S): Face-to-face and telephone interviews and questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of pregnancy. Cox regression analysis compared the efficacy of cycle-based fertility treatments with no cycle-based fertility treatment after multivariable adjustment. RESULT(S): Couples using one to two medications-only cycles had a significantly higher pregnancy rate (hazard ratio [HR] 4.7 [95% confidence interval 1.3-16.6]), a benefit that did not persist after three or more cycles (HR 0.6 [0.1-3.2]). Couples using IUI for one (HR 2.9 [1.4-5.8]), two (HR 2.0 [0.9-4.5]), and three cycles (HR 4.5 [1.8-10.9]) were more likely to achieve a pregnancy. No additional benefit was seen for couples using four or more IUI cycles (HR 1.0 [0.4-2.6]). In vitro fertilization was associated with significant benefit for couples using one (HR 2.8 [1.5-5.2]) and two cycles (HR 2.2 [1.2-4.1]). Couples using three or more IVF cycles had a non-statistically significant higher likelihood of pregnancy (HR 1.3 [0.7-2.4]). CONCLUSION(S): Cycle-based fertility treatments may offer a point of diminishing returns for infertile couples: two cycles of medications only, three cycles of IUI, and two cycles of IVF.
Authors: D S Guzick; S A Carson; C Coutifaris; J W Overstreet; P Factor-Litvak; M P Steinkampf; J A Hill; L Mastroianni; J E Buster; S T Nakajima; D L Vogel; R E Canfield Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-01-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Matorras; F Rodríguez; G Gutierrez de Terán; J I Pijoan; O Ramón; F J Rodríguez-Escudero Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: E G Hughes; M L Beecroft; V Wilkie; L Burville; P Claman; I Tummon; E Greenblatt; M Fluker; K Thorpe Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: James F Smith; Michael L Eisenberg; David Glidden; Susan G Millstein; Marcelle Cedars; Thomas J Walsh; Jonathan Showstack; Lauri A Pasch; Nancy Adler; Patricia P Katz Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Patricia Katz; Jonathan Showstack; James F Smith; Robert D Nachtigall; Susan G Millstein; Holly Wing; Michael L Eisenberg; Lauri A Pasch; Mary S Croughan; Nancy Adler Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: L Aghajanova; S Mahadevan; S Altmäe; A Stavreus-Evers; L Regan; N Sebire; P Dixon; R A Fisher; I B Van den Veyver Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: J Richard Pilsner; Hachem Saddiki; Brian W Whitcomb; Alexander Suvorov; Germaine M Buck Louis; Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Oladele A Oluwayiose; Laura B Balzer Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.353
Authors: Joseph B Stanford; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Ahmad Hammoud; Mark Gibson; Ken R Smith Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Adão Francisco Lucas; Dibaba B Gemechu; Stefan S Du Plessis; Yapo G Aboua Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 3.412