INTRODUCTION: Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. AIM: To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. RESULTS: Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47%, isolated male factor was present in 12%, combined male and female factors were present in 16%, and unexplained infertility was present in 25% of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD] 2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. CONCLUSIONS: Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.
INTRODUCTION:Male factor infertility is a relatively common problem. This diagnosis may increase sexual, marital, and relationship strain in male partners of infertile couples. AIM: To measure the personal, social, sexual, and marital impacts of a male factor infertility diagnosis among men in couples evaluated for infertility. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 357 men in infertile couples from eight academic and community-based fertility clinics. Participants completed written surveys and face-to-face and telephone interviews at study enrollment. This interview queried each participant's perception of their infertility etiology to determine the primary study exposure (i.e., male factor only, male and female factors, female factor only, unknown). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Personal Impact, Social Impact, Marital Impact, and Sexual Impact scales. RESULTS: Among the 357 men, no male factor was reported in 47%, isolated male factor was present in 12%, combined male and female factors were present in 16%, and unexplained infertility was present in 25% of couples. Male factor infertility was independently associated with worse Sexual (mean 39 vs. 30, standard deviation [SD] 2.7, P = 0.004) and Personal (mean 37 vs. 29, SD 3.8, P = 0.04) Impact scores relative to men in couples without male factor infertility. These differences remained statistically significant after controlling for male age, partner age, race, religion, educational level, employment status, prior pregnancy, duration of infertility, and prior paternity. CONCLUSIONS: Male partners in couples who perceive isolated male factor infertility have a lower sexual and personal quality of life compared with male partners of couples without perceived male factor infertility. Social strain is highest among couples without a clear etiology for infertility. These findings highlight the clinically significant negative sexual, personal, and social strains of a perceived infertility diagnosis for men.
Authors: Christian J Nelson; Alan W Shindel; Cathy K Naughton; Michael Ohebshalom; John P Mulhall Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2008-06-28 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Alan W Shindel; Christian J Nelson; Cathy K Naughton; Michael Ohebshalom; John P Mulhall Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-01-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: R Matthew Coward; Christy Stetter; Allen Kunselman; J C Trussell; Mark C Lindgren; Ruben R Alvero; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Christos Coutifaris; Michael P Diamond; Karl R Hansen; Stephen A Krawetz; Richard S Legro; Randal D Robinson; James F Smith; Anne Z Steiner; Robert A Wild; Heping Zhang; Nanette Santoro Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; J C Trussell; LaTasha B Craig; Clarisa Gracia; Hao Huang; Ruben Alvero; Peter Casson; Gregory Christman; Christos Coutifaris; Michael Diamond; Susan Jin; Richard S Legro; Randal D Robinson; William D Schlaff; Heping Zhang Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Patricia Katz; Jonathan Showstack; James F Smith; Robert D Nachtigall; Susan G Millstein; Holly Wing; Michael L Eisenberg; Lauri A Pasch; Mary S Croughan; Nancy Adler Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Piotr Kocełak; Jerzy Chudek; Beata Naworska; Monika Bąk-Sosnowska; Barbara Kotlarz; Monika Mazurek; Paweł Madej; Violetta Skrzypulec-Plinta; Piotr Skałba; Magdalena Olszanecka-Glinianowicz Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 3.257