Literature DB >> 18031306

Evolutionary responses to environmental changes: how does competition affect adaptation?

Jacob Johansson1.   

Abstract

The role and importance of ecological interactions for evolutionary responses to environmental changes is to large extent unknown. Here it is shown that interspecific competition may slow down rates of adaptation substantially and fundamentally change patterns of adaptation to long-term environmental changes. In the model investigated here, species compete for resources distributed along an ecological niche space. Environmental change is represented by a slowly moving resource maximum and evolutionary responses of single species are compared with responses of coalitions of two and three competing species. In scenarios with two and three species, species that are favored by increasing resource availability increase in equilibrium population size whereas disfavored species decline in size. Increased competition makes it less favorable for individuals of a disfavored species to occupy a niche close to the maximum and reduces the selection pressure for tracking the moving resource distribution. Individual-based simulations and an analysis using adaptive dynamics show that the combination of weaker selection pressure and reduced population size reduces the evolutionary rate of the disfavored species considerably. If the resource landscape moves stochastically, weak evolutionary responses cause large fluctuations in population size and thereby large extinction risk for competing species, whereas a single species subject to the same environmental variability may track the resource maximum closely and maintain a much more stable population size. Other studies have shown that competitive interactions may amplify changes in mean population sizes due to environmental changes and thereby increase extinction risks. This study accentuates the harmful role of competitive interactions by illustrating that they may also decrease rates of adaptation. The slowdown in evolutionary rates caused by competition may also contribute to explain low rates of morphological change in spite of large environmental fluctuations found in fossil records.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031306     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00301.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  29 in total

1.  On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Josh J Tewksbury; Kimberly S Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Evolving entities: towards a unified framework for understanding diversity at the species and higher levels.

Authors:  Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A crucial step toward realism: responses to climate change from an evolving metacommunity perspective.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Luc De Meester; Mark Vellend; Robby Stoks; Joost Vanoverbeke
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Evolutionary responses to environmental change: trophic interactions affect adaptation and persistence.

Authors:  Jarad P Mellard; Claire de Mazancourt; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Prey body mass and richness underlie the persistence of a top predator.

Authors:  Laura Melissa Guzman; Diane S Srivastava
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Asymmetric competition impacts evolutionary rescue in a changing environment.

Authors:  Courtney L Van Den Elzen; Elizabeth J Kleynhans; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolutionary rescue can maintain an oscillating community undergoing environmental change.

Authors:  Gregor F Fussmann; Andrew Gonzalez
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Specific adaptation to strong competitors can offset the negative effects of population size reductions.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Zhao; Angus Buckling; Quan-Guo Zhang; Elze Hesse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Earlier phenology of a nonnative plant increases impacts on native competitors.

Authors:  Jake M Alexander; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Earthworm genomes, genes and proteins: the (re)discovery of Darwin's worms.

Authors:  S R Stürzenbaum; J Andre; P Kille; A J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.