Literature DB >> 18030527

Impact of pelvic radiotherapy on morbidity and durability of sphincter preservation after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers.

Imran Hassan1, David W Larson, Bruce G Wolff, Robert R Cima, Heidi K Chua, Dieter Hahnloser, Megan M O'Byrne, Dirk R Larson, John H Pemberton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the impact of pelvic radiotherapy on the incidence of complications and colostomy-free survival of patients after a coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.
METHODS: A total of 192 patients underwent a coloanal anastomosis between 1982 and 2001: 87 patients did not receive pelvic radiotherapy; 105 patients received pelvic radiotherapy (39 preoperative and 66 postoperative). Early and late complications requiring surgical intervention and the colostomy-free survival rate were assessed by retrospective review of patient records.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 62 months, 151 patients were alive. The most frequent complication was development of an anastomotic stricture (5-year rate of a stricture, 16 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 10-21). Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy had a higher rate of complications other than anastomotic strictures, including fecal incontinence, fistulas, abscesses, and bowel obstructions compared with patients not receiving pelvic radiotherapy (5-year rate: 20 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 10-29) vs. 5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0-10); P = 0.001). Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy had a lower colostomy-free survival than did patients not receiving pelvic radiotherapy (5-year colostomy-free rate: 72 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 62-84) vs. 92 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 86-98); P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the colostomy-free survival of patients receiving preoperative and postoperative pelvic radiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: After coloanal anastomosis, a significant number of patients will have complications requiring surgical intervention, and some will require a permanent colostomy. Pelvic radiotherapy, whether it is administered preoperatively or postoperatively, significantly increases the need for a permanent colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18030527     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9099-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

1.  External coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashraf Abdel-Azeem Mohamed; Abdel-Fatah Saleh Abdel-Fatah; Khaled Mohamed Mahran; Abo-Bakr Mohamed Mohie-Eldin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Joanna Chung Kiu Mak; Dominic Chi Chung Foo; Rockson Wei; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The Role of Temporary Fecal Diversion.

Authors:  Amy L Lightner; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  Mapping of lateral pelvic lymph node recurrences in rectal cancer: a radiation oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Seo Hee Choi; Jee Suk Chang; Hong In Yoon; Dong-Su Jang; Nam Kyu Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Byung So Min; Hyuk Huh; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Pathologic response grade after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not influence morbidity in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer resected by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Filippo Landi; Eloy Espín; Victor Rodrigues; Francesc Vallribera; Aleix Martinez; Cecile Charpy; Francesco Brunetti; Daniel Azoulay; Nicola de'Angelis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yoshito Akagi; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Risk factors of permanent stomas in patients with rectal cancer after low anterior resection with temporary stomas.

Authors:  Chul Min Lee; Jung Wook Huh; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Hee Cheol Kim; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Reduced pelvic field sparing anastomosis for postoperative radiotherapy in selected patients with mid-upper rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seo Hee Choi; Jee Suk Chang; Nam Kyu Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Byung So Min; Hyuk Hur; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Yong Bae Kim; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  The Role of Diverting Stoma After an Ultra-low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Chang Sik Yu; Gwon Sik Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 10.  Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: A review of the updated literature.

Authors:  Kazuo Shirouzu; Naotaka Murakami; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.