Literature DB >> 18029508

New methods for improved evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.

U Ekelund1, J L Forberg.   

Abstract

This paper aims to identify and review new and unproven emergency department (ED) methods for improved evaluation in cases of suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Systematic news coverage through PubMed from 2000 to 2006 identified papers on new methods for ED assessment of patients with suspected ACS. Articles found described decision support models, new ECG methods, new biomarkers and point-of-care testing, cardiac imaging, immediate exercise tests and the chest pain unit concept. None of these new methods is likely to be the perfect solution, and the best strategy today is therefore a combination of modern methods, where the optimal protocol depends on local resources and expertise. With a suitable combination of new methods, it is likely that more patients can be managed as outpatients, that length of stay can be shortened for those admitted, and that some patients with ACS can get earlier treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18029508      PMCID: PMC2658347          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2007.048249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  56 in total

1.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology position statement on radionuclide imaging in patients with suspected acute ischemic syndromes in the emergency department or chest pain center.

Authors:  Frans J Th Wackers; Kenneth A Brown; Gary V Heller; Michael C Kontos; James L Tatum; James E Udelson; Jack A Ziffer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Echocardiography in the evaluation of patients in chest pain units.

Authors:  William R Lewis
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.213

3.  High-frequency QRS electrocardiogram for diagnosing and monitoring ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Shimon Abboud; Sharon Zlochiver
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 4.  Biomarkers in acute cardiac disease: the present and the future.

Authors:  Allan S Jaffe; Luciano Babuin; Fred S Apple
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Francis M Fesmire; Wyatt W Decker; Deborah B Diercks; Chris A Ghaemmaghami; Devorah Nazarian; William J Brady; Sigrid Hahn; Andy S Jagoda
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Decision support and the appropriate use of fibrinolysis in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Kellett
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

7.  MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Antonio J Pena; Fabian Moselewski; Maros Ferencik; Suhny Abbara; Ricardo C Cury; Claudia U Chae; John T Nagurney
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Point-of-care testing reduces length of stay in emergency department chest pain patients.

Authors:  Adam J Singer; Joshua Ardise; Janet Gulla; Julie Cangro
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 10.  Advantages of multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Tamar Gaspar; David A Halon; Nathan Peled
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.439

View more
  4 in total

1.  Emergency Cardiac Biomarkers and Point-of-Care Testing: Optimizing Acute Coronary Syndrome Care Using Small-World Networks In Rural Settings.

Authors:  Gerald J Kost; Laurie E Kost; Audhaiwan Suwanyangyuen; Simrin K Cheema; Corbin Curtis; Stephanie Sumner; Jimmy Yu; Richard Louie
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2010-06

2.  Cardiac myosin binding protein-C is a potential diagnostic biomarker for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Suresh Govindan; Andrew McElligott; Saminathan Muthusamy; Nandini Nair; David Barefield; Jody L Martin; Enrique Gongora; Kenneth D Greis; Pradeep K Luther; Saul Winegrad; Kyle K Henderson; Sakthivel Sadayappan
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.000

3.  Likelihood of acute coronary syndrome in emergency department chest pain patients varies with time of presentation.

Authors:  Ulf Ekelund; Mahin Akbarzadeh; Ardavan Khoshnood; Jonas Björk; Mattias Ohlsson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-08-08

4.  Negative predictive value and potential cost savings of acute nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging in low risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a prospective single blinded study.

Authors:  Jakob L Forberg; Catarina E Hilmersson; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Jonas Björk; Krister Hjalte; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.