Literature DB >> 15940089

Point-of-care testing reduces length of stay in emergency department chest pain patients.

Adam J Singer1, Joshua Ardise, Janet Gulla, Julie Cangro.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine the effect of cardiac troponin I point-of-care testing on emergency department (ED) length of stay in chest pain patients.
METHODS: This was a before-and-after trial in a university-based ED with 75,000 annual visits. Participants were consecutive patients with a chief complaint of chest pain who were admitted to the hospital. During the first 2-week period (before), only central laboratory testing of troponin was performed. During the second 2-week period (after), treating nurses performed bedside point-of-care testing for troponin I, as well as central laboratory testing. Test turnaround times, time from triage until calling in admissions, and time from triage until patients left the ED to be transferred to a floor (ED length of stay) were determined and compared between the 2 study periods. Comparisons between study periods are expressed as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A sample of 100 patients in each group had 90% power to detect a 1-hour difference in length of stay (2-tailed alpha=0.05).
RESULTS: There were 232 patients before and 134 after introduction of point-of-care testing. Mean age (SD) was 63 years (16 years), and 44% were female patients. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The rate of positive troponins was also similar (9.5% versus 6.1%). ED length of stay was significantly reduced after introduction of point-of-care testing (5.2 hours [95% CI 4.6 to 5.8 hours] versus 7.1 hours [95% CI 6.6 to 7.7 hours]; mean difference 1.9 hours [95% CI 1.1 to 2.7 hours]). The time until the admission was called in to bed control was also significantly reduced by introducing point-of-care testing (2.7 hours [95% CI 2.4 to 3.1 hours] versus 4.7 hours [95% CI 4.3 to 5.0 hours]; mean difference 1.9 hours [95% CI 1.4 to 2.5 hours]). Point-of-care testing turnaround (14.8 minutes [95% CI 14.1 to 15.5 minutes]) was significantly shorter than for central laboratory testing (83 minutes [95% CI 77 to 89 minutes]; mean difference 68 minutes [95% CI 62 minutes to 74 minutes]). With central testing as the criterion standard, point-of-care testing had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63% to 100%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI 92% to 99%).
CONCLUSION: Bedside performance of troponin I point-of-care testing by treating nurses significantly reduces ED length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940089     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  24 in total

Review 1.  New methods for improved evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.

Authors:  U Ekelund; J L Forberg
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Laboratory turnaround time.

Authors:  Robert C Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-11

Review 3.  Effectiveness of practices for improving the diagnostic accuracy of Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices™ systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher Layfield; John Rose; Aaron Alford; Susan R Snyder; Fred S Apple; Farah M Chowdhury; Michael C Kontos; L Kristin Newby; Alan B Storrow; Milenko Tanasijevic; Elizabeth Leibach; Edward B Liebow; Robert H Christenson
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.281

4.  Impact of Rapid Molecular Respiratory Virus Testing on Real-Time Decision Making in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Daniel T Rogan; Mohit S Kochar; Samuel Yang; James V Quinn
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 5.  Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department: Current Status.

Authors:  Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Emergency Cardiac Biomarkers and Point-of-Care Testing: Optimizing Acute Coronary Syndrome Care Using Small-World Networks In Rural Settings.

Authors:  Gerald J Kost; Laurie E Kost; Audhaiwan Suwanyangyuen; Simrin K Cheema; Corbin Curtis; Stephanie Sumner; Jimmy Yu; Richard Louie
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2010-06

7.  Reliability of the CARE rule and the HEART score to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Moumneh; Vanessa Richard-Jourjon; Emilie Friou; Fabrice Prunier; Caroline Soulie-Chavignon; Jacques Choukroun; Betty Mazet-Guilaumé; Jérémie Riou; Andréa Penaloza; Pierre-Marie Roy
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

9.  Diagnosis of acute serious illness: the role of point-of-care technologies.

Authors:  Gregory L Damhorst; Erika A Tyburski; Oliver Brand; Greg S Martin; Wilbur A Lam
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-16

10.  US emergency department performance on wait time and length of visit.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Jeremy Green; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.