Literature DB >> 18029111

Radiation dose to the lens during craniospinal irradiation-an improvement in proton radiotherapy technique.

David M Cochran1, Torunn I Yock, Judith A Adams, Nancy J Tarbell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of angle modification of cranial field proton beam therapy on the radiation dose delivered to the lens during craniospinal irradiation (CSI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients with central nervous system tumors who received CSI with a posterior fossa boost were analyzed for the radiation dose to the lens. Thirteen patients received cranial field treatment using standard opposed-lateral proton beams, and 26 patients received treatment with angled posterior-oblique proton beams. The lens dose in a test case also was evaluated by comparing conventional X-rays with the two proton beam planning methods by using a CMS/Xio three-dimensional planning system.
RESULTS: Substantial lens dose sparing was realized with the angling of the cranial proton beams 15 degrees -20 degrees to the posterior. In the 39 treated patients who were analyzed (median age, 7 years), average dose delivered to the lens was decreased by approximately 50% by angling of the proton beams, with the average maximum dose decreasing from 74% to 40% of the prescribed dose (p < 0.0001). Significant lens sparing was seen in patients 10 years and younger (median age, 6 years; p < 0.0001), whereas an insignificant decrease was seen in older patients (median age, 16 years; p = 0.14). With the opposed-lateral technique (median age, 6 years), the lens dose increased significantly with decreasing age (p = 0.002), whereas there was no effect of age on lens dose in the angled beam-treated group (median age, 8.5 years; p = 0.73).
CONCLUSION: The present study clearly shows an advantage in sparing of the lens dose by angling the beams used during proton beam CSI. This effect is most pronounced in patients 10 years and younger because of anatomic effects of sinus development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18029111     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Technique, outcomes, and acute toxicities in adults treated with proton beam craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Christian L Barney; Aaron P Brown; David R Grosshans; Mary Frances McAleer; John F de Groot; Vinay Puduvalli; Susan L Tucker; Cody N Crawford; Mark R Gilbert; Paul D Brown; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Comparison of risk of radiogenic second cancer following photon and proton craniospinal irradiation for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Rebecca M Howell; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Anita Mahajan; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Wassim Jalbout; Rebecca M Howell; Nabil Khater; Fady Geara; Kenneth Homann; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Clinical controversies: proton therapy for pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Dilemmas concerning dose distribution and the influence of relative biological effect in proton beam therapy of medulloblastoma.

Authors:  B Jones; P Wilson; A Nagano; J Fenwick; G McKenna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Proton Therapy: Ever Shifting Sands and the Opportunities and Obligations within.

Authors:  Christine E Hill-Kayser; Stefan Both; Zelig Tochner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Proton radiotherapy for solid tumors of childhood.

Authors:  Shane E Cotter; Sean M McBride; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-15

8.  Dosimetric characterization of whole brain radiotherapy of pediatric patients using modulated proton beams.

Authors:  Hosang Jin; Wen Hsi; Daniel Yeung; Zuofeng Li; Nancy P Mendenhall; Robert B Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  Comparison of proton therapy techniques for treatment of the whole brain as a component of craniospinal radiation.

Authors:  Jeffrey Dinh; Joshua Stoker; Rola H Georges; Narayan Sahoo; X Ronald Zhu; Smruti Rath; Anita Mahajan; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Increases Estimated Clinical Benefit in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lisanne V van Dijk; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Bennie ten Haken; Hans Paul van der Laan; Aart A van 't Veld; Johannes A Langendijk; Erik W Korevaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.