Literature DB >> 21809165

Prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a single center experience.

Zachary Torgersen1, Abhishek Sundaram, Masato Hoshino, Brittany Willer, Xiang Fang, Tsewang Tashi, Tommy Lee, Sumeet K Mittal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to explore the prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer patients after neo-adjuvant therapy.
METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified esophageal cancer patients with locoregional disease who received neo-adjuvant therapy and surgery. Patients were grouped based on the number of nodes resected, pathological lymph node status, and percentage of positive nodes. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients formed the study group. Patients with ≥ 18 nodes resected had a significantly longer median OS than those with <18 nodes resected (68.6 vs. 29.6 months; p = 0.014). Lymph node-negative patients had significantly longer median OS (51.4 vs. 27.4 months; p = 0.025) and DFS (45.3 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.03) when compared to lymph node-positive patients. Patients with a percentage of positive nodes <0.25 had a significantly longer median OS (31.1 vs. 17.8 months; p = 0.015) and DFS (21.7 vs. 8.9 months; p = 0.021) than patients with ≥ 0.25% positive.
CONCLUSION: Extent of lymphadenectomy, percentage of positive nodes, and pathological lymph node status are significant prognostic markers in patients who undergo esophagectomy after neo-adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21809165     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1635-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

1.  The assessment of prognosis of surgically resected oesophageal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined pathologically.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Wyn G Lewis; Matthew A Morgan; David Chan; Geoffrey W B Clark; Tim Havard; Tom D Crosby; S Ashley Roberts; Geriant T Williams
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Portale; Jeffrey A Hagen; Jeffrey H Peters; Linda S Chan; Steven R DeMeester; Tasha A K Gandamihardja; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant strategies for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  John R Hyngstrom; Mitchell C Posner
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; P R Schauer; N A Christie; T L Weigel; S Raja; H C Fernando; R J Keenan; N T Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status.

Authors:  Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Renee Desmond; Miguel R Arguedas; Carolyn E Reed; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J-L Lee; S I Park; S-B Kim; H-Y Jung; G H Lee; J-H Kim; H-Y Song; K-J Cho; W-K Kim; J-S Lee; S-H Kim; Y-I Min
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nasser K Altorki; Xi Kathy Zhou; Brendon Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Subroto Paul; Paul C Lee; Madhu Mazumdar
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas W Rice; Long-Qi Chen; Paul H Schipper; Kenneth A Kesler; Simon Law; Toni E M R Lerut; Carolyn E Reed; Jarmo A Salo; Walter J Scott; Wayne L Hofstetter; Thomas J Watson; Mark S Allen; Valerie W Rusch; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the impact on surgical management.

Authors:  Masahiko Ikebe; Masaru Morita; Manabu Yamamoto; Yasushi Toh
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abhishek Sundaram; Juan C Geronimo; Brittany L Willer; Masato Hoshino; Zachary Torgersen; Arpad Juhasz; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does the lymph node yield affect survival in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy plus esophagectomy? A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donglai Chen; Yiming Mao; Yuhang Xue; Yonghua Sang; Desen Liu; Yongbing Chen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.