Literature DB >> 18028918

Education improves colonoscopy appropriateness.

Mario Grassini1, Carlo Verna, Edda Battaglia, Paolo Niola, Monica Navino, Gabrio Bassotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness in GI endoscopy is critical to face the rising amount of demands. Education of physicians has been advocated to reduce the level of inappropriateness.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the effectiveness of an educational program in determining a reduction of inappropriate colonoscopies in an open access system.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: A single endoscopy unit in Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 495 consecutive outpatients referred to our endoscopy unit by family physicians for diagnostic colonoscopy before the educational course and 522 after its completion, for a total of 1017 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Inappropriate colonoscopy reduction rates, cost savings, and reduction of waiting lists were evaluated.
RESULTS: With regard to inappropriate colonoscopies, the post-course group rate of inappropriateness was significantly lower than that of the pre-course group (P < or = .001). The economic savings for 1 year was estimated to be euro19,000. The reduction of the waiting list was about 15% of the original value.
CONCLUSIONS: Education has a high incidence in reducing inappropriate colonoscopies in an open-access system determining reduction of costs and waiting lists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18028918     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Hood colonoscopy in trainees: a useful adjunct to improve the performance.

Authors:  Raffaele Manta; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Paolo Fedeli; Paolo Viaggi; Danilo Castellani; Rita Conigliaro; Enzo Masci; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol.

Authors:  Gilles Jobin; Marie Pierre Gagnon; Bernard Candas; Catherine Dubé; Anis Ben Abdeljelil; Sonya Grenier
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 5.  Quality Improvement in Gastroenterology: A Systematic Review of Practical Interventions for Clinicians.

Authors:  Courtney Reynolds; Eric Esrailian; Daniel Hommes
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The Impact on Endoscopic Resource Utilization After a Targeted Intervention for Cost-Minimization of EGD and Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sindhu R Kaitha; George Salem; Yan D Zhao; Mohammad F Madhoun; Allshine Chen; William M Tierney
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Z Gimeno García; Y González; E Quintero; D Nicolás-Pérez; Z Adrián; R Romero; O Alarcón Fernández; M Hernández; M Carrillo; V Felipe; J Díaz; L Ramos; M Moreno; A Jiménez-Sosa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer diagnosis: Pitfalls and opportunities.

Authors:  Pablo Vega; Fátima Valentín; Joaquín Cubiella
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

9.  CO(2) insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Jun Kato; Motoaki Kuriyama; Keisuke Hori; Shin Ishikawa; Keita Harada; Koji Takemoto; Sakiko Hiraoka; Hideyuki Fujita; Joichiro Horii; Yutaka Saito; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A cross-sectional study of the appropriateness of colonoscopy requests in the Spanish region of Catalonia.

Authors:  Diana Puente; Francesc Xavier Cantero; Maria Llagostera; Pilar Piñeiro; Raquel Nieto; Rosa Saladich; Juanjo Mascort; Mercè Marzo; Jesús Almeda; Manel Segarra
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.