Literature DB >> 26690833

Colorectal cancer diagnosis: Pitfalls and opportunities.

Pablo Vega1, Fátima Valentín1, Joaquín Cubiella1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health problem in the Western world. The diagnostic process is a challenge in all health systems for many reasons: There are often no specific symptoms; lower abdominal symptoms are very common and mostly related to non-neoplastic diseases, not CRC; diagnosis of CRC is mainly based on colonoscopy, an invasive procedure; and the resource for diagnosis is usually scarce. Furthermore, the available predictive models for CRC are based on the evaluation of symptoms, and their diagnostic accuracy is limited. Moreover, diagnosis is a complex process involving a sequence of events related to the patient, the initial consulting physician and the health system. Understanding this process is the first step in identifying avoidable factors and reducing the effects of diagnostic delay on the prognosis of CRC. In this article, we describe the predictive value of symptoms for CRC detection. We summarize the available evidence concerning the diagnostic process, as well as the factors implicated in its delay and the methods proposed to reduce it. We describe the different prioritization criteria and predictive models for CRC detection, specifically addressing the two-week wait referral guideline from the National Institute of Clinical Excellence in terms of efficacy, efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. Finally, we collected information on the usefulness of biomarkers, specifically the faecal immunochemical test, as non-invasive diagnostic tests for CRC detection in symptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Diagnostic accuracy; Diagnostic yield; Faecal immunochemical test; Health plan implementation; Open endoscopy unit; Practice guidelines; Primary health care; Risk stratification

Year:  2015        PMID: 26690833      PMCID: PMC4678389          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i12.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  80 in total

1.  The EPAGE internet guideline as a decision support tool for determining the appropriateness of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Olivier Terraz; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Gabriel Jeannot; Bernard Burnand; Florian Froehlich; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Jennifer K Harris; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 2.  Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

Authors:  Paul Hewitson; Paul Glasziou; Eila Watson; Bernie Towler; Les Irwig
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer--applying a gender lens.

Authors:  Devesh V Oberoi; Moyez Jiwa; Alexandra McManus; Rupert Hodder
Journal:  Qual Prim Care       Date:  2014

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: comparison with NICE and SIGN referral criteria.

Authors:  J Cubiella; M Salve; M Díaz-Ondina; P Vega; M T Alves; F Iglesias; E Sánchez; P Macía; I Blanco; L Bujanda; J Fernández-Seara
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  The appropriateness of colonoscopies at a teaching hospital: magnitude, associated factors, and comparison of EPAGE and EPAGE-II criteria.

Authors:  Lidia Argüello; Virginia Pertejo; Marta Ponce; Salvador Peiró; Vicente Garrigues; Julio Ponce
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Missed opportunities in early diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maite Domínguez-Ayala; Jonathan Díez-Vallejo; Angel Comas-Fuentes
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy II guidelines help in selecting and prioritizing patients referred to colonoscopy--a quality control study.

Authors:  Sigrun Losada Eskeland; Eirin Dalén; Jon Sponheim; Even Lind; Cathrine Brunborg; Thomas de Lange
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Evaluation of the implementation of Galician Health Service indications and priority levels for colonoscopy in symptomatic patients: prospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pablo Vega-Villaamil; María Salve-Bouzo; Joaquín Cubiella; Fátima Valentín-Gómez; Eloy Sánchez-Hernández; Isabel Gómez-Fernández; Javier Fernández-Seara
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Edward Dadswell; Kate Wooldrage; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Niels W Schurink; Doenja M J Lambregts; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Mutant p53 drives cancer chemotherapy resistance due to loss of function on activating transcription of PUMA.

Authors:  Yuan Huang; Nannan Liu; Jing Liu; Yeying Liu; Chuchu Zhang; Shuaiyu Long; Guang Luo; Lingling Zhang; Yingjie Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Faecal haemoglobin concentration thresholds for reassurance and urgent investigation for colorectal cancer based on a faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients in primary care.

Authors:  Craig Mowat; Jayne Digby; Judith A Strachan; Rebecca K McCann; Francis A Carey; Callum G Fraser; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.057

4.  Awareness of colorectal cancer signs and symptoms: a national cross-sectional study from Palestine.

Authors:  Mohamedraed Elshami; Mohammed Majed Ayyad; Nasser Abu-El-Noor; Bettina Bottcher; Mohammed Alser; Ibrahim Al-Slaibi; Shoruq Ahmed Naji; Balqees Mustafa Mohamad; Wejdan Sudki Isleem; Adela Shurrab; Bashar Yaghi; Yahya Ayyash Qabaja; Fatima Khader Hmdan; Mohammad Fuad Dwikat; Raneen Raed Sweity; Remah Tayseer Jneed; Khayria Ali Assaf; Maram Elena Albandak; Mohammed Madhat Hmaid; Iyas Imad Awwad; Belal Khalil Alhabil; Marah Naser Alarda; Amani Saleh Alsattari; Moumen Sameer Aboyousef; Omar Abdallah Aljbour; Rinad AlSharif; Christy Teddy Giacaman; Ali Younis Alnaga; Ranin Mufid Abu Nemer; Nada Mahmoud Almadhoun; Sondos Mahmoud Skaik
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Diagnosis reliability of combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal-immunochemical test in colorectal neoplasia screening.

Authors:  Dana Iovanescu; Mirela Frandes; Diana Lungeanu; Amelia Burlea; Bogdan P Miutescu; Eftimie Miutescu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Alterations in PGC1α expression levels are involved in colorectal cancer risk: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Jéssica Alonso-Molero; Carmen González-Donquiles; Tania Fernández-Villa; Fernanda de Souza-Teixeira; Laura Vilorio-Marqués; Antonio J Molina; Vicente Martín
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment Methods: Mapping of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi; Ali Sarabi Asiabar; Saber Azami-Aghdash; Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar; Aziz Rezapour
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

8.  RAD52 gene polymorphisms are associated with risk of colorectal cancer in a Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Longyi Zhang; Yongjun Zhang; Chih-Hsin Tang; Chen-Ming Su
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Health-Seeking Behavior and Barriers to Care in Patients With Rectal Bleeding in Nigeria.

Authors:  Olusegun I Alatise; Sara E Fischer; Omobolaji O Ayandipo; Akinlolu G Omisore; Samuel A Olatoke; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 10.  Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) can help to rule out colorectal cancer in patients presenting in primary care with lower abdominal symptoms: a systematic review conducted to inform new NICE DG30 diagnostic guidance.

Authors:  Marie Westwood; Shona Lang; Nigel Armstrong; Sietze van Turenhout; Joaquín Cubiella; Lisa Stirk; Isaac Corro Ramos; Marianne Luyendijk; Remziye Zaim; Jos Kleijnen; Callum G Fraser
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.