Literature DB >> 18026965

Modified Longo's stapled hemorrhoidopexy with additional traction sutures for the treatment of residual prolapsed piles.

Chuang-Wei Chen1, Jung-Cheng Kang, Chang-Chieh Wu, Cheng-Wen Hsiao, Shu-Wen Jao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Residual prolapsed piles is a problem after the stapled hemorrhoidopexy, especially in large third- or fourth-degree hemorrhoids. We have developed a method using additional traction sutures along with modified Longo's procedure to manage this problem.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to October 2005, 30 consecutive patients with symptomatic third- or fourth-degree hemorrhoids who underwent the modified Longo's stapled hemorrhoidopexy with additional traction sutures in a single institution were collected. The demographics, postoperative pain score, surgical features, outcomes, and early and late complications were recorded. All patients were followed for a mean duration of 8.8 (range, 4-15) months.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (17 males) with a mean age of 45 (range, 27-63) years were identified. The mean postoperative pain score on the morning of the first postoperative day was 2.8 (range, 1-4). The mean duration of operation was 30.7 (range, 25-37) min. The mean duration of hospital stay was 2 (range, 1-3) days. The mean days for patients to resume normal work was 6.7 (range, 4-9) days. No other procedure-related complications occurred in all patients. There was no early complication except for fecal urgency found in one patient during the first postoperative days. Regarding the late complications, no residual prolapsed piles, persistent anal pain, incontinence, anal stenosis, or recurrent symptoms were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experiences indicated that this modified procedures truly contributed to reduce the residual internal hemorrhoids and maintained the benefits of stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Randomized trial and long-term follow-up warrant to determine possible surgical and functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18026965     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0404-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

Review 1.  Modified Longo's hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  D Lloyd; K S Ho; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  Lap-Yuen Wong; Jeng-Kae Jiang; Shih-Ching Chang; Jen-Kou Lin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature.

Authors:  Héctor Ortiz; José Marzo; Pedro Armendáriz; Mario De Miguel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  [Morbidity after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: long-term results about 140 patients and review of the literature].

Authors:  P Pessaux; J-J Tuech; B Laurent; N Regenet; E Lermite; M Simone; N Huten; N De Manzini; J-P Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  2004-12

Review 6.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; Austin G Acheson; Keith R Neal; John H Scholefield
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew Maw; Kong-Weng Eu; Francis Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study.

Authors:  I Goulimaris; I Kanellos; E Christoforidis; I Mantzoros; Ch Odisseos; D Betsis
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

9.  Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial.

Authors:  A Racalbuto; I Aliotta; G Corsaro; R Lanteri; A Di Cataldo; A Licata
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: surgical notes and results.

Authors:  Domenico Mascagni; Kenneth Paul Zeri; Filippo Maria Di Matteo; Nadia Peparini; Alessandro Maturo; Alberto Berni
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Pei-Jing Cui; Hua-Zhong Han; Da-Nian Tong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liesel J Porrett; Jemma K Porrett; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

3.  Intraoperative ligation of residual haemorrhoids after stapled mucosectomy.

Authors:  P Garg
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Glyceryl trinitrate ointment did not reduce pain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Trent Cross; Lynne Bartlett; Chrispen Mushaya; Mohamed Ashour; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.