Literature DB >> 18026809

Mortality rate in veterans with multiple chronic conditions.

Todd A Lee1, Alexandra E Shields, Christine Vogeli, Teresa B Gibson, Min Woong-Sohn, William D Marder, David Blumenthal, Kevin B Weiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients with multiple chronic conditions, there is increasing appreciation of the complex interrelatedness of diseases. Previous studies have focused on the prevalence and economic burden associated with multiple chronic conditions, much less is known about the mortality rate associated with specific combinations of multiple diseases.
OBJECTIVE: Measure the mortality rate in combinations of 11 chronic conditions.
DESIGN: Cohort study of veteran health care users. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans between 55 and 64 years that used Veterans Health Administration health care services between October 1999 and September 2000. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were identified as having one or more of the following: COPD, diabetes, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, asthma, depression, ischemic heart disease, dementia, stroke, and cancer. Mutually exclusive combinations of disease based on these conditions were created, and 5-year mortality rates were determined.
RESULTS: There were 741,847 persons included. The number in each group by a count of conditions was: none = 217,944 (29.34%); 1 = 221,111 (29.8%); 2 = 175,228 (23.6%); 3 = 86,447 (11.7%); and 4+ = 41,117 (5.5%). The 5-year mortality rate by the number of conditions was: none = 4.1%; 1 = 6.0%; 2 = 7.8%; 3 = 11.2%; 4+ = 16.7%. Among combinations with the same number of conditions, there was significant variability in mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple chronic conditions have higher mortality rates. Because there was significant variation in mortality across clusters with the same number of conditions, when studying patients with multiple coexisting illnesses, it is important to understand not only that several conditions may be present but that specific conditions can differentially impact the risk of mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18026809      PMCID: PMC2219704          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0277-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


INTRODUCTION

Diseases are often described and studied as if they occur in isolation of other disease states, yet many individuals have multiple chronic conditions. Cooccurrence of various chronic conditions can have unexpected consequences on disability,1 lead to deficiencies in care,2 and impact the benefit of clinical practice guidelines.3 Yet, little is known about the overall impact on mortality of specific combinations of chronic conditions. The increasing prevalence of multiple coexisting chronic diseases with age is a phenomenon that makes sense from a biological and clinical basis and has been described by several investigators. For example, in The Netherlands, more than 60% of persons between 60 and 79 years old have more then one chronic condition, and the average number of chronic conditions in this group is 2.4.4 In the United States, for persons older than 65 years, the average number of chronic conditions is 2.3, and the prevalence of persons with more than one chronic condition is 64.7%.5 In addition, patients with more chronic conditions have higher health care expenditures. Again, in persons in the United States over 65 years of age, the average annual expenditures for those with four or more chronic conditions was $13,973, and among those with three chronic conditions, expenditures were $4,701.5 For persons receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the average annual cost was $9,277 for those with three or more chronic conditions and was $3,366 in those with two chronic conditions.6 These studies show that there is a substantial proportion of older patients that have multiple chronic conditions, and these patients have higher health care expenditures. It remains unclear whether there are specific disease groups or clusters that are associated with increased risk of mortality among persons with multiple chronic diseases. There are several recent examples of how the Charlson index and other risk indices, as well as identification of individual diseases, have been used to successfully predict mortality.7–16 In addition, we generally know how individual diseases increase the risk of mortality, but whether specific combinations of diseases have an additive or multiplicative effect on overall mortality when present with other chronic diseases is not well understood. The objective of this study was to describe the 5-year mortality rates across patients with multiple chronic conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The national Veterans Affairs (VA) inpatient, outpatient, and mortality databases were used to conduct a cohort study to examine the risk of mortality associated with clusters of chronic diseases. The study population was US veterans using the VHA health care system between the age of 55 and 64 years. As of April 2000, there were approximately 4.4 million veterans that received health care services through VHA.17 The VHA maintains databases of all encounters for patients receiving care in the VHA health care system or through contract services with other providers. We used care provided at VHA facilities as well as care provided through contracted services to identify chronic conditions for patients included in this analysis. Information on inpatient admissions, outpatient encounters, and dates of death are available in the databases.

Cohort

The cohort used in the analysis was all veterans with at least one health care contact with the VA system between October 1, 1999 and September 30, 2000. Veterans between the ages of 55 and 64 years of age during this 12-month period were included in the analysis. The cohort was followed until September 30, 2004.

Disease Clusters

Patients were identified as having one or more of the following conditions based on ICD-9 codes: COPD, diabetes, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, asthma, depression, ischemic heart disease, dementia, stroke, and cancer. These chronic diseases were chosen based on the list of priority conditions—conditions that are prevalent and high cost in the United States—from the Agency for Health care Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The ICD-9 codes used to identify the conditions were based on the AHRQ Clinical Classification System (Appendix).18 Based on inpatient and outpatient encounters within the VA health care system in 2000, patients were categorized into mutually exclusive groups of chronic diseases. Persons were defined as having one of the chronic conditions if they had any diagnosis code for the condition during the 1-year time period. The diagnostic codes were combined to create mutually exclusive combinations of the chronic diseases so that persons would only be included in one chronic disease combination. Persons without a diagnosis for any of the conditions were categorized into a “none of the selected conditions” group.

Mortality

Deaths occurring during the 5-year period following identification of the cohort were determined. Both inpatient data and the Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) data were used to identify all deaths that occurred during the follow-up period. The BIRLS data have been reported to capture between 90 and 95% of veterans that die.19,20 Date of death was assigned on the basis of discharge date for deaths that occurred in the hospital. For deaths not identified in the inpatient data, the date of death was the date reported in the BIRLS database.

Analysis

Patients were classified into mutually exclusive disease clusters based on their diagnosis codes during the initial 12-month period. The proportion of patients in each mutually exclusive cluster was determined. Patients were grouped into the following categories according to the number of diseases in their cluster: none; one; two; three; or four or more. We present data in the tables for clusters that included more than 1,000 patients. The cumulative 5-year mortality rates and 95% confidence intervals were determined for each cluster and for the four categories based on a count of the number of diseases in a cluster. Cumulative 5-year mortality rates were adjusted for age by standardizing each cluster to the age of the overall cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 741,847 patients between 55 and 64 years had at least one VA health care encounter between October 1, 1999 and September 30, 2000. There were two groups combined that contained 43.9% of the population. There were 217,944 (29.4%) patients identified as not having any of the selected conditions and 107,732 (14.5%) identified as having hypertension and none of the other selected conditions. The top five two cluster groupings all included hypertension as one of the conditions and were: hypertension + diabetes (6.4%); heart disease + hypertension (3.8%); hypertension + osteoarthritis (3.2%); hypertension + COPD (1.6%); and cancer + hypertension (1.0%). Among those conditions with more than 1,000 persons, hypertension was one of the conditions in each of the clusters that included three or four conditions. When grouping the clusters by the number of conditions, the majority of the patients included in this analysis had either none of the selected conditions (29.4%) or only a single condition by itself (29.8%). Thus, there was 40.8% of the population that had a cluster of diseases (i.e., two or more conditions), with a decreasing proportion in each group as the number of conditions increased (two conditions = 23.6%; three conditions = 11.7%; four or more conditions = 5.5%). A total of 52,306 patients died during the 5-year follow-up period, which equates to an overall 5-year mortality rate of 7.1%. The mortality rate was lowest among those with none of the selected diseases (4.1%) and increased as the number of conditions increased. Compared to patients with none of the selected conditions, the risk of death during the follow-up period for each of the other groups was: one condition risk ratio (RR) = 1.45 (95% CI, 1.41–1.49); two conditions RR = 1.88 (95% CI, 1.83–1.93); three conditions RR = 2.72 (95% CI, 2.65–2.80); and four or more conditions RR = 4.07 (95% CI, 3.95–4.19). Among those identified with only a single condition, there was nearly a tenfold difference in the lowest to highest mortality rate. The age-adjusted, 5-year mortality rate ranged from 2.77% for osteoarthritis to 22.46% for cancer (Table 1). There were a total of 23 clusters that included only two conditions. The age-adjusted, 5-year mortality rate among the two condition clusters ranged from 2.94% for hypertension + osteoarthritis to 40.41% for cancer + COPD (Table 2). Interestingly, when osteoarthritis was present in a two-condition group, the 5-year mortality rate was lower in the two-condition cluster than the mortality rate in the condition by itself. For example, the 5-year mortality rate for individuals with hypertension alone was 3.81%, whereas in those with hypertension and osteoarthritis, the rate was 2.94%. Not surprisingly, the presence of cancer in a cluster was associated with higher 5-year mortality rates, of the three two-condition clusters with a mortality greater than 20%, each of them included cancer as one of the conditions.
Table 1

Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with only a Single Condition or None of the Conditions

 5-year mortality rate
NumberCrude (%)Age adjusted (%)95% CI (%)
Osteoarthritis25,2312.752.77(2.56, 2.97)
Asthma3,3993.183.13(2.54, 3.71)
Hypertension107,7323.813.81(3.70, 3.93)
None of the selected conditions217,9444.114.14(4.06, 4.22)
Depression10,9224.384.66(4.19, 5.13)
Rheumatoid arthritis1,6945.966.05(4.90, 7.20)
Ischemic heart disease16,8986.186.18(5.81, 6.54)
Diabetes24,1587.067.07(6.75, 7.39)
Stroke2,0239.349.24(7.99, 10.50)
COPD15,54013.1513.08(12.55, 13.61)
Dementia2,19714.7515.07(13.55, 16.60)
Cancer10,48922.2622.46(21.65, 23.26)
Table 2

Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with Two Conditions

Cluster5-year mortality rate
NumberCrude (%)Age adjusted (%)95% CI (%)
Hypertension and osteoarthritis2,0882.942.942.72, 3.15
Depression and osteoarthritis23,6922.833.032.18, 3.88
Asthma and hypertension2,4183.393.342.62, 4.05
Ischemic heart disease and osteoarthritis2,8453.873.813.11, 4.52
Diabetes and osteoarthritis3,6524.854.844.15, 5.54
Hypertension and rheumatoid arthritis1,1444.904.913.66, 6.16
Depression and hypertension6,4105.165.444.81, 6.06
Hypertension and ischemic heart disease28,1545.585.665.38, 5.93
Diabetes and hypertension47,5686.286.286.07, 6.50
Depression and diabetes1,4406.466.505.12, 7.88
Depression and ischemic heart disease1,0306.506.915.26, 8.56
Asthma and COPD1,5767.998.046.70, 9.38
Hypertension and stroke3,6798.708.757.83, 9.68
COPD and osteoarthritis3,1069.539.498.46, 10.52
Diabetes and ischemic heart disease1,27411.4011.3810.56, 12.21
Depression and COPD5,79011.0711.609.70, 13.49
COPD and hypertension11,88312.2212.1411.55, 12.74
Cancer and osteoarthritis1,33812.2612.2910.51, 14.06
Dementia and hypertension1,20312.8812.8811.00, 14.76
COPD and ischemic heart disease7,23515.5915.0313.76, 16.29
Cancer and hypertension3,06014.9315.3614.49, 16.24
Diabetes and COPD1,70416.6116.5614.78, 18.34
Cancer and ischemic heart disease1,02321.7022.6019.84, 25.36
Cancer and diabetes1,25324.3424.9022.45, 27.35
Cancer and COPD1,86039.8440.4138.07, 42.75
Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with only a Single Condition or None of the Conditions Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with Two Conditions Similar to the two-condition clusters, there was significant variability in the 5-year mortality rate among the three-condition clusters. The 5-year mortality rate ranged from 4.2% for hypertension + depression + osteoarthritis to 34.6% for cancer + hypertension + COPD (Table 3). Among those conditions with mortality rates greater than 15%, each included either COPD or cancer as one of the conditions.
Table 3

Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with Three Conditions

Cluster5-year mortality rate
NumberCrude (%)Age adjusted (%)95% CI (%)
Hypertension and depression and osteoarthritis1,9593.884.163.16, 5.16
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and osteoarthritis5,9454.614.523.99, 5.05
Hypertension and diabetes and osteoarthritis9,1365.325.304.84, 5.76
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and depression1,8667.347.666.40, 8.92
Hypertension and diabetes and depression2,7827.848.177.06, 9.27
Hypertension and COPD and asthma1,1598.288.366.75, 9.97
Hypertension and COPD and osteoarthritis3,0739.249.188.15, 10.20
Cancer and hypertension and osteoarthritis1,4339.499.407.82, 10.99
Ischemic heart disease and stroke and hypertension2,02510.4710.499.11, 11.87
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and diabetes19,16111.1311.1010.65, 11.55
Stroke and hypertension and diabetes2,13312.5612.7211.29, 14.16
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and COPD5,55614.6714.4613.52, 15.40
Hypertension and diabetes and COPD3,68715.3015.2014.02, 16.37
Ischemic heart disease and cancer and hypertension1,80416.7417.6515.70, 19.60
Cancer and hypertension and diabetes2,80917.8418.0516.53, 19.58
Cancer and hypertension and COPD1,36033.9734.6231.84, 37.40
Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with Three Conditions There were seven four-condition clusters that included more than 1,000 individuals. Each of the clusters included ischemic heart disease, whereas all but one included hypertension, and all but two included diabetes. The 5-year mortality rate ranged from 9.4% for ischemic heart disease + hypertension + diabetes + osteoarthritis to 22.3% for ischemic heart disease + hypertension + diabetes + COPD (Table 4). For the clusters that included ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes, the fourth condition in the cluster influences the overall 5-year mortality rate. The mortality rates for these clusters with respect to the fourth condition were: osteoarthritis = 9.4%, depression = 12.7%, stroke = 16.8%; cancer = 22.0%; and COPD = 22.3%.
Table 4

Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with Four Conditions

Cluster5-year mortality rate
NumberCrude (%)Age adjusted (%)95% CI (%)
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and diabetes and osteoarthritis3,8219.409.378.42, 10.31
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and COPD and osteoarthritis1,55011.8111.6610.03, 13.30
Hypertension and diabetes and COPD and osteoarthritis1,07312.4012.2310.25, 14.20
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and diabetes and depression1,50612.4812.6710.95, 14.39
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and diabetes and stroke1,85016.9716.7715.03, 18.52
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and diabetes and cancer1,14222.2421.5618.96, 24.15
Ischemic heart disease and hypertension and diabetes and COPD3,20422.3822.3320.86, 23.81
Five-Year Mortality Rate Among Patients with Four Conditions

DISCUSSION

In this analysis, we found that the presence of chronic conditions in veterans between the ages of 55 and 64 years is high, and a significant number of these individuals have two or more conditions. Not surprisingly, the presence of more conditions was associated with a higher risk of 5-year mortality. However, there was a wide range in the mortality rates across clusters with the same number of conditions, indicating the presence of specific diseases within a cluster impacted the risk of 5-year mortality differently. Previous studies, both on a veteran cohort6 and on a sample of the general U.S. population,5 found that costs increased dramatically as the number of chronic conditions increased. These previous studies did not look at the risk of mortality associated with chronic conditions. We found a similar pattern with respect to mortality in that as the number of chronic conditions increased, the 5-year mortality rates also increased for patients with three or four chronic conditions. It was also apparent that combining the conditions by simply using a count of the number of conditions results in substantial loss of information regarding the outcomes of patients with multiple chronic conditions. That is, not all clusters of two conditions were equivalent, and the risk of mortality was highly dependent on the conditions that comprised the clusters. Therefore, when examining persons with multiple coexisting conditions, it is important to understand the components of a cluster, and it may be misleading to combine groups based on the number of chronic conditions. Unlike the previous work examining multiple chronic conditions,5,6 we focused on a limited number of chronic conditions. Where Yu et al.6 included 29 conditions, and Wolff et al.5 used 24 categories of diagnostic groups, we chose to focus on 11 major conditions in creating our clusters of diseases. The conditions we included are high prevalence and high cost conditions in the United States and as such represent high priority conditions for health care agencies. Expansion of our list from these 11 conditions would have resulted in a larger number of total clusters that patients could have fallen into (there were 1,348 unique disease groups with at least one patient in this analysis) and would have also reduced the sample size in each of the clusters. However, by focusing only on these conditions, we are essentially ignoring the impact of other conditions that the patient may have and that could affect both costs and the risk of mortality. For example, if a condition occurred more frequently with one of the conditions included in this analysis, we would be picking up the effect of the condition that we measured as well as the unmeasured condition. There are other limitations to our analysis, one of which is the fact that the classification of individuals into chronic disease clusters was based on ICD-9 codes available at the inception of the cohort, and subsequent development of disease during the 5-year follow-up was not incorporated into the analysis. As noted above, we did not consider other conditions in creating our disease clusters nor did we use other diseases as risk adjusters. We confined our analysis to veterans between 55 and 64 years to limit the effects of age on outcomes and to use a population that was not yet eligible to receive Medicare services. Therefore, the results are most generalizable to males in this age range, and findings could be substantially different for females and other ages. Only diagnoses that were associated with a VA encounter or VA contracted services were used in the analysis, and thus, if veterans were receiving care outside of the system, these diagnoses were not captured. Finally, because we rely on administrative data from a single year to characterize our cohort, we are unable to accurately capture the duration and severity of disease and the validity of ICD-9 codes in identifying diseases likely varies. The risk of mortality within the selected age group may be modified by the duration of disease, which is not accounted for in this analysis. For example, the effect of diabetes on mortality in persons included in this analysis may be very different if the diabetes developed when the patient was 40 years old compared to when they were 60 years old. In addition, if severity of disease is associated with the presence of more conditions, the increase in risk of mortality would be because of a combination of disease severity and other conditions. We found that patients with multiple chronic conditions in the VA health care system represent a significant proportion of VA patients and have an increased risk for mortality. Not surprisingly, more conditions were associated with higher rates of mortality; however, there was significant variation in clusters with the same number of diseases. Thus, when studying patients with multiple coexisting illnesses, it is important to understand not only that several conditions may be present but that the specific conditions can differentially impact the risk of mortality.
Table 5

ICD-9 Codes Included in Definition of Chronic Diseases

Chronic conditionEligible ICD-9 codes
Asthma493.x,494.x
Cancer140.x, 141.x, 142.x, 143.x, 144.x, 145.x, 146.x, 147.x, 148.x, 149.x, 150.x, 151.x, 152.x, 153.x, 154.x, 155.x, 156.x, 157.x, 158.x, 159.0, 160.x, 161.x, 162.x, 170.x, 171.x, 174.x, 175.x, 179, 180.x, 182.x, 185, 186.0, 186.9, 188.x, 189.0, 189.1, 191.x, 192.x, 195.0, 230.x, 231.x, 233.x, V10.xx
COPD491.x, 492.x, 496
Dementia290.x, 293.x, 294.x, 310.x, 331.0, 331.1, 331.1x, 331.2, 331.82, 797
Depression296.2x, 296.3x, 300.4
Diabetes250.x, 790.2x, 791.5, 791.6, V45.85, V53.91, V65.46
Hypertension401.1, 401.9, 401.0, 402.x, 403.x, 404.x, 405.01, 405.09, 405.11, 405.19, 405.91, 405.99, 437.2
Ischemic heart disease410.x, 411.0, 411.1, 411.8x, 412, 413.0, 413.1, 413.9, 414.x, V45.81, V45.82
Osteoarthritis715.x
Rheumatoid arthritis714, 714.0
Stroke430, 431, 432.x, 433.x, 434.x, 435.x, 436
  18 in total

1.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Barbara Starfield; Gerard Anderson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-11

2.  New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Vijaya Sundararajan; Toni Henderson; Catherine Perry; Amanda Muggivan; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases.

Authors:  M van den Akker; F Buntinx; J F Metsemakers; S Roos; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases.

Authors:  D A Redelmeier; S H Tan; G L Booth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Ascertainment of mortality in the U.S. veteran population: World War II veteran twins.

Authors:  W F Page; M M Braun; N E Caporaso
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Assessing and using comorbidity measures in elderly veterans with lower extremity amputations.

Authors:  Jibby E Kurichi; Margaret G Stineman; Pui L Kwong; Barbara E Bates; Dean M Reker
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Impact of two different comorbidity measures on the 6-month mortality of critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Márcio Soares; Jorge I F Salluh; Carlos Gil Ferreira; Ronir R Luiz; Nelson Spector; José R Rocco
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality.

Authors:  Anthony J Perkins; Kurt Kroenke; Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; John W Williams; Carol Hope; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Vital status ascertainment through the files of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration.

Authors:  W F Page; C M Mahan; H K Kang
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Association of comorbidity with disability in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study.

Authors:  L P Fried; K Bandeen-Roche; J D Kasper; J M Guralnik
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  61 in total

1.  Transforming Care for Complex Patients: Addressing Interconnected Medical, Social, and Behavioral Challenges.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Research priorities in geriatric palliative care: multimorbidity.

Authors:  Christine S Ritchie; Donna M Zulman
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Diabetes and the hospitalized patient : A cluster analytic framework for characterizing the role of sex, race and comorbidity from 2006 to 2011.

Authors:  Nisha Nataraj; Julie Simmons Ivy; Fay Cobb Payton; Joseph Norman
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-07-22

4.  Nonsymptomatic Factors More Strongly Associated with High-Quality End-of-Life Care than Symptomatic Factors for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Gayle Kricke; Donna Woods; Alicia Arbaje; Neil Jordan
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Promoting access through complementary eHealth technologies: recommendations for VA's Home Telehealth and personal health record programs.

Authors:  Timothy P Hogan; Bonnie Wakefield; Kim M Nazi; Thomas K Houston; Frances M Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patterns of chronic co-morbid medical conditions in older residents of U.S. nursing homes: differences between the sexes and across the agespan.

Authors:  K L Moore; W J Boscardin; M A Steinman; J B Schwartz
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Multiple chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries: state-level variations in prevalence, utilization, and cost, 2011.

Authors:  Kimberly A Lochner; Richard A Goodman; Samual Posner; Anand Parekh
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2013-07-23

8.  Patterns of multimorbidity in elderly veterans.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Sei J Lee; W John Boscardin; Yinghui Miao; Kathy Z Fung; Kelly L Moore; Janice B Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Using a Clinical Knowledge Base to Assess Comorbidity Interrelatedness Among Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Susana B Martins; Yan Liu; Samson W Tu; Brian B Hoffman; Steven M Asch; Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  Burden of COPD in a government health care system: a retrospective observational study using data from the US Veterans Affairs population.

Authors:  Amir Sharafkhaneh; Nancy J Petersen; Hong-Jen Yu; Anand A Dalal; Michael L Johnson; Nicola A Hanania
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2010-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.