Literature DB >> 17435390

Assessing and using comorbidity measures in elderly veterans with lower extremity amputations.

Jibby E Kurichi1, Margaret G Stineman, Pui L Kwong, Barbara E Bates, Dean M Reker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding comorbidity prevalence and the effects of comorbidities in older veterans with lower extremity amputations may aid in assessing patient outcomes, resource use, and facility-level quality of care.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree to which adding outpatient to inpatient administrative data sources yields higher comorbidity prevalence estimates and improved explanatory power of models predicting 1-year mortality and to compare the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity measures.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study applying frequencies, cross-tabulations, and logistic regression models was conducted, including data from 2,375 veterans with lower extremity amputations. Comorbidity prevalence according to the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser measures, 1-year mortality rates, and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Comorbidity prevalence estimates increased sharply for both the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser measures with the addition of data from multiple settings. The Elixhauser compared to the Charlson/Deyo generally yielded higher estimates but did not improve explanatory power for mortality. Modeling expected versus actual deaths produced varying SMRs across geographic regions but was not dependent on which measure or data sources were used.
CONCLUSIONS: Merging outpatient with inpatient data may reduce the under coding of comorbidities but does not enhance mortality prediction. Compared to the Charlson/Deyo, the Elixhauser has a more complete coding scheme for comorbid conditions, such as diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease, important to addressing lower extremity amputation etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17435390      PMCID: PMC3662494          DOI: 10.1159/000101703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Survival following lower-limb amputation in a veteran population.

Authors:  J A Mayfield; G E Reiber; C Maynard; J M Czerniecki; M T Caps; B J Sangeorzan
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  Use of administrative data to risk adjust amputation rates in a national cohort of medicare-enrolled veterans with diabetes.

Authors:  Chin-Lin Tseng; Mangala Rajan; Donald R Miller; Gerald Hawley; Stephen Crystal; Minge Xie; Anjali Tiwari; Monika Safford; Leonard Pogach
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.

Authors:  Joseph P Parker; Zhongmin Li; Cheryl L Damberg; Beate Danielsen; David M Carlisle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalizations.

Authors:  G J Stukenborg; D P Wagner; A F Connors
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Predicting in-hospital deaths from coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Do different severity measures give different predictions?

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; M Shwartz; B E Landon; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  21 in total

1.  Prognostic differences for functional recovery after major lower limb amputation: effects of the timing and type of inpatient rehabilitation services in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Margaret G Stineman; Pui L Kwong; Dawei Xie; Jibby E Kurichi; Diane Cowper Ripley; David M Brooks; Douglas E Bidelspach; Barbara E Bates
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Norton scale scores and 1-year mortality in elderly patients following lower limb amputations.

Authors:  R Sever; S Sherman; N Rozen; O Chechik; S Hilu; S Abdelrazek; M Salai; D Justo
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Patient-, treatment-, and facility-level structural characteristics associated with the receipt of preoperative lower extremity amputation rehabilitation.

Authors:  Barbara E Bates; Richard Hallenbeck; Toni Ferrario; Pui L Kwong; Jibby E Kurichi; Margaret G Stineman; Dawei Xie
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Factors influencing receipt of outpatient rehabilitation services among veterans following lower extremity amputation.

Authors:  Jianxun Zhou; Barbara E Bates; Jibby E Kurichi; Pui L Kwong; Dawei Xie; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  Epidemiology of limb loss.

Authors:  Priya Varma; Margaret G Stineman; Timothy R Dillingham
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.784

6.  Possible incremental benefits of specialized rehabilitation bed units among veterans after lower extremity amputation.

Authors:  Jibby E Kurichi; Dylan S Small; Barbara E Bates; Janet A Prvu-Bettger; Pui L Kwong; W Bruce Vogel; Douglas E Bidelspach; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Factors influencing decisions to admit patients to veterans affairs specialized rehabilitation units after lower-extremity amputation.

Authors:  Barbara E Bates; Pui L Kwong; Jibby E Kurichi; Douglas E Bidelspach; Dean M Reker; Greg Maislin; Dawei Xie; Margaret Stineman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Factors associated with home discharge after rehabilitation among male veterans with lower extremity amputation.

Authors:  Jibby E Kurichi; Diane Cowper Ripley; Dawei Xie; Pui L Kwong; Barbara E Bates; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation in the acute postoperative phase of care after transtibial or transfemoral amputation: study of an integrated health care delivery system.

Authors:  Margaret G Stineman; Pui L Kwong; Jibby E Kurichi; Janet A Prvu-Bettger; W Bruce Vogel; Greg Maislin; Barbara E Bates; Dean M Reker
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Rates and timing of central venous cannulation among patients with sepsis and respiratory arrest admitted by the emergency department*.

Authors:  Daniel Theodoro; Pamela L Owens; Margaret A Olsen; Victoria Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.