Literature DB >> 19641079

A rat excised larynx model of vocal fold scar.

Nathan V Welham1, Douglas W Montequin, Ichiro Tateya, Tomoko Tateya, Seong Hee Choi, Diane M Bless.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a rat excised larynx model for the measurement of acoustic, aerodynamic, and vocal fold vibratory changes resulting from vocal fold scar.
METHOD: Twenty-four 4-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to 1 of 4 experimental groups: chronic vocal fold scar, chronic vocal fold scar treated with 100-ng basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), chronic vocal fold scar treated with saline (sham treatment), and unscarred untreated control. Following tissue harvest, histological and immunohistochemical data were collected to confirm extracellular matrix alteration in the chronic scar group; acoustic, aerodynamic, and high-speed digital imaging data were collected using an excised larynx setup in all groups. Phonation threshold pressure (P(th)), glottal resistance (R(g)), glottal efficiency (E(g)), vibratory amplitude, and vibratory area were used as dependent variables.
RESULTS: Chronically scarred vocal folds were characterized by elevated collagen Types I and III and reduced hyaluronic acid abundance. Phonation was achieved, and data were collected from all control and bFGF-treated larynges; however, phonation was not achieved with 3 of 6 chronically scarred and 1 of 6 saline-treated larynges. Compared with control, the chronic scar group was characterized by elevated P(th), reduced E(g), and intralarynx vibratory amplitude and area asymmetry. The bFGF group was characterized by P(th) below control-group levels, E(g) comparable with control, and vocal fold vibratory amplitude and area symmetry comparable with control. The sham group was characterized by P(th) comparable with control, E(g) superior to control, and vocal fold vibratory amplitude and area symmetry comparable with control.
CONCLUSIONS: The excised larynx model reported here demonstrated robust deterioration across phonatory indices under the scar condition and sensitivity to treatment-induced change under the bFGF condition. The improvement observed under the sham condition may reflect unanticipated therapeutic benefit or artifact. This model holds promise as a tool for the functional characterization of biomechanical tissue changes resulting from vocal fold scar and the evaluation of experimental therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641079      PMCID: PMC2719832          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0049)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  57 in total

1.  Visualization and quantification of the medial surface dynamics of an excised human vocal fold during phonation.

Authors:  Michael Doellinger; David A Berry
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Phonation thresholds as a function of laryngeal size in a two-mass model of the vocal folds.

Authors:  Jorge C Lucero; Laura L Koenig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of vocal fold scarring on phonation: predictions from a finite element model.

Authors:  David A Berry; Haven Reininger; Fariborz Alipour; Diane M Bless; Charles N Ford
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Dependence of phonation threshold pressure on vocal tract acoustics and vocal fold tissue mechanics.

Authors:  Roger W Chan; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Endothelial growth factors VEGF and bFGF differentially enhance monocyte and neutrophil recruitment to inflammation.

Authors:  Sandra I Zittermann; Andrew C Issekutz
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.962

6.  Viscoelastic and histologic properties in scarred rabbit vocal folds after mesenchymal stem cell injection.

Authors:  S Hertegård; J Cedervall; B Svensson; K Forsberg; F H J Maurer; D Vidovska; P Olivius; L Ahrlund-Richter; K Le Blanc
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2) potentiates leukocyte recruitment to inflammation by enhancing endothelial adhesion molecule expression.

Authors:  Sandra I Zittermann; Andrew C Issekutz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Investigation of anti-hyaluronidase treatment on vocal fold wound healing.

Authors:  Bernard Rousseau; Ichiro Tateya; Xinhong Lim; Alejandro Munoz-del-Rio; Diane M Bless
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Histologic characterization of rat vocal fold scarring.

Authors:  Tomoko Tateya; Ichiro Tateya; Jin Ho Sohn; Diane M Bless
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  RatMap--rat genome tools and data.

Authors:  Greta Petersen; Per Johnson; Lars Andersson; Karin Klinga-Levan; Pedro M Gómez-Fabre; Fredrik Ståhl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  36 in total

1.  Biosimulation of inflammation and healing in surgically injured vocal folds.

Authors:  Nicole Y K Li; Yoram Vodovotz; Patricia A Hebda; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  An in vivo study of composite microgels based on hyaluronic acid and gelatin for the reconstruction of surgically injured rat vocal folds.

Authors:  Jiska M S Coppoolse; T G Van Kooten; Hossein K Heris; Luc Mongeau; Nicole Y K Li; Susan L Thibeault; Jacob Pitaro; Olubunmi Akinpelu; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Microstructural and mechanical characterization of scarred vocal folds.

Authors:  Hossein K Heris; Amir K Miri; Nageswara R Ghattamaneni; Nicole Y K Li; Susan L Thibeault; Paul W Wiseman; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  The unsolved chapter of vocal fold scars and how tissue engineering could help us solve the problem.

Authors:  M Graupp; S Bachna-Rotter; C Gerstenberger; G Friedrich; E Fröhlich-Sorger; K Kiesler; M Gugatschka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Microarray-driven validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in a rat vocal fold model of mucosal injury.

Authors:  Zhen Chang; Changying Ling; Masaru Yamashita; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Epidermal growth factor mediated healing in stem cell-derived vocal fold mucosa.

Authors:  Liliana Palencia; Amritava Das; Sean P Palecek; Susan L Thibeault; Ciara Leydon
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Alteration in cellular morphology, density and distribution in rat vocal fold mucosa following injury.

Authors:  Changying Ling; Masaru Yamashita; Emily A Waselchuk; Jennifer L Raasch; Diane M Bless; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Investigation of phonatory characteristics using ex vivo rabbit larynges.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; David A Berry; Veronika Birk; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Dürr; Christoph Alexiou; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of vocal fold injury location on vibratory parameters in excised canine larynges.

Authors:  Christopher R Krausert; Di Ying; Seong Hee Choi; Matthew R Hoffman; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Use of the rabbit larynx in an excised larynx setup.

Authors:  Allison L Maytag; Mark J Robitaille; Adam L Rieves; James Madsen; Benjamin L Smith; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.