Literature DB >> 18022368

p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry.

Maojun Yang1, Bing Li, Diana R Tomchick, Mischa Machius, Josep Rizo, Hongtao Yu, Xuelian Luo.   

Abstract

The status of spindle checkpoint signaling depends on the balance of two opposing dynamic processes that regulate the highly unusual two-state behavior of Mad2. In mitosis, a Mad1-Mad2 core complex recruits cytosolic Mad2 to kinetochores through Mad2 dimerization and converts Mad2 to a conformer amenable to Cdc20 binding, thereby facilitating checkpoint activation. p31(comet) inactivates the checkpoint through binding to Mad1- or Cdc20-bound Mad2, thereby preventing Mad2 activation and promoting the dissociation of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex. Here, we report the crystal structure of the Mad2-p31(comet) complex. The C-terminal region of Mad2 that undergoes rearrangement in different Mad2 conformers is a major structural determinant for p31(comet) binding, explaining the specificity of p31(comet) toward Mad1- or Cdc20-bound Mad2. p31(comet) adopts a fold strikingly similar to that of Mad2 and binds at the dimerization interface of Mad2. Thus, p31(comet) exploits the two-state behavior of Mad2 to block its activation by acting as an "anti-Mad2."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18022368      PMCID: PMC2144745          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  32 in total

1.  Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  L Sironi; M Melixetian; M Faretta; E Prosperini; K Helin; A Musacchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Lucia Sironi; Marina Mapelli; Stefan Knapp; Anna De Antoni; Kuan-Teh Jeang; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Substructure solution with SHELXD.

Authors:  Thomas R Schneider; George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-09-28

4.  Conformation-specific binding of p31(comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Guohong Xia; Xuelian Luo; Toshiyuki Habu; Josep Rizo; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Miscellaneous algorithms for density modification.

Authors:  K Cowtan; P Main
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1998-07-01

6.  Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  L H Hwang; L F Lau; D L Smith; C A Mistrot; K G Hardwick; E S Hwang; A Amon; A W Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing.

Authors:  Jagesh V Shah; Elliot Botvinick; Zahid Bonday; Frank Furnari; Michael Berns; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Cdc20: a WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine.

Authors:  Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer.

Authors:  Rajnish Bharadwaj; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 10.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.

Authors:  Andrea Musacchio; Edward D Salmon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  111 in total

1.  MTBP plays a crucial role in mitotic progression and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  N Agarwal; Y Tochigi; A S Adhikari; S Cui; Y Cui; T Iwakuma
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  Closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) is selectively incorporated into the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC).

Authors:  Aaron R Tipton; Michael Tipton; Tim Yen; Song-Tao Liu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Structural insights into anaphase-promoting complex function and mechanism.

Authors:  David Barford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Depletion of p31comet protein promotes sensitivity to antimitotic drugs.

Authors:  Hoi Tang Ma; Yan Yan Chan; Xiao Chen; Kin Fan On; Randy Y C Poon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  RED, a spindle pole-associated protein, is required for kinetochore localization of MAD1, mitotic progression, and activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Pei-Chi Yeh; Chang-Ching Yeh; Yi-Cheng Chen; Yue-Li Juang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex.

Authors:  William C H Chao; Kiran Kulkarni; Ziguo Zhang; Eric H Kong; David Barford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  P Silva; J Barbosa; A V Nascimento; J Faria; R Reis; H Bousbaa
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 9.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells.

Authors:  Reto Gassmann; Andrew J Holland; Dileep Varma; Xiaohu Wan; Filiz Civril; Don W Cleveland; Karen Oegema; Edward D Salmon; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.