Literature DB >> 18020855

Using the common-sense model to predict risk perception and disease-related worry in individuals at increased risk for venous thrombosis.

Ad A Kaptein1, Inez M van Korlaar, Linda D Cameron, Carla Y Vossen, Felix J M van der Meer, Frits R Rosendaal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study applied the Common-Sense Model (CSM) to predict risk perception and disease-related worry in 174 individuals with a genetic predisposition to venous thrombosis (thrombophilia).
DESIGN: Participants completed an adapted version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) and measures assessing risk perception and worry.
RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed that illness perceptions were predictors of risk perception and thrombosis worry. The hypothesis that illness perceptions mediate the relationship between a person's experience of venous thrombosis and perceived risk and thrombosis worry could not be confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research should refine the IPQ-R for populations at risk of a disease and examine the value of the CSM in explaining the relationship between risk perception, worry, and health behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18020855     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  17 in total

1.  Illness perceptions, risk perception and worry in SDH mutation carriers.

Authors:  L T van Hulsteijn; A A Kaptein; A Louisse; N R Biermasz; J W A Smit; E P M Corssmit
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-16

Review 3.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Impact of health beliefs, social support and self-efficacy on physical activity and dietary habits during the post-partum period after gestational diabetes mellitus: study protocol.

Authors:  Barbara Kaiser; Chantal Razurel; Emilien Jeannot
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  A survey to assist in targeting the adults who undertake risky behaviours, know their health behaviours are not optimal and who acknowledge being worried about their health.

Authors:  Anne W Taylor; Kay Price; Simon Fullerton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Measuring and Validating a General Cancer Predisposition Perception Scale: An Adaptation of the Revised-IPQ-Genetic Predisposition Scale.

Authors:  Wendy Wing Tak Lam; Qiuyan Liao; Jennifer Hiu Fai Wong; Ching Lung Lai; Man Fung Yuen; Janice Wing Hang Tsang; Richard Fielding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Qualitative Study to Appraise Patients and Family Members Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes towards Venous Thromboembolism Risk.

Authors:  Claudie Haxaire; Cécile Tromeur; Francis Couturaud; Christophe Leroyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.