Literature DB >> 18008157

The cost effectiveness of intracyctoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Bruce Hollingsworth1, Anthony Harris, Duncan Mortimer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of ICSI, and total costs for the population of Australia.
METHODS: Treatment effects for three patient groups were drawn from a published systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing fertilisation outcomes for ICSI. Incremental costs derived from resource-based costing of ICSI and existing practice comparators for each patient group.
RESULTS: Incremental cost per live birth for patients unsuited to IVF is estimated between A$8,500 and 13,400. For the subnormal semen indication, cost per live birth could be as low as A$3,600, but in the worst case scenario, there would just be additional incremental costs of A$600 per procedure. Multiplying out the additional costs of ICSI over the relevant target populations in Australia gives potential total financial implications of over A$31 million per annum.
CONCLUSION: While there are additional benefits from ICSI procedure, particularly for those with subnormal sperm, the additional cost for the health care system is substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18008157      PMCID: PMC3454996          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-007-9175-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  14 in total

1.  Comparison between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with high insemination concentration after total fertilization failure in a previous IVF attempt.

Authors:  P M Kastrop; S M Weima; R J Van Kooij; E R Te Velde
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? Considerations of fertilization and embryo development, cost effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  B Ola; M Afnan; K Sharif; S Papaioannou; N Hammadieh; C L Barratt
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  P N Kolettis; A J Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Cost-effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in comparison with donor insemination.

Authors:  M Granberg; M Wikland; L Hamberger
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Economic strategies in modern male subfertility treatment.

Authors:  F Comhaire
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  C P Pavlovich; P N Schlegel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Transport in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: results of a collaborative trial.

Authors:  A E Alfonsín; A R Amato; A Arrighi; J A Blaquier; M Cogorno; E S Feldman; F Gonzalez Echeverría; M Horton; D L Della Vecchia; N Millas
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular extraction of sperm combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  A Heidenreich; P Altmann; U H Engelmann
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  B J Van Voorhis; M Barnett; A E Sparks; C H Syrop; G Rosenthal; J Dawson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  JohnA Collins
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Authors:  E Bosch; J J Espinós; F Fabregues; J Fontes; J García-Velasco; J Llácer; A Requena; M A Checa; J Bellver
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The effect of ICSI in infertility couples with non-male factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting Geng; Lin Cheng; Caiyun Ge; Yuanzhen Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Male subfertility and the role of micronutrient supplementation: clinical and economic issues.

Authors:  Umme Salma; Harjinder Kaur Gill; Louis G Keith; Sandra Tilmon; Christopher A Jones; Anjali Sobti; Ashlesha Patel
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2011-08-09

4.  The association of impaired semen quality and pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction technology cycles: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Del Giudice; Federico Belladelli; Tony Chen; Frank Glover; Evan A Mulloy; Alex M Kasman; Alessandro Sciarra; Stefano Salciccia; Vittorio Canale; Martina Maggi; Matteo Ferro; Gian Maria Busetto; Ettore De Berardinis; Andrea Salonia; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.532

Review 5.  Cost-effectiveness of varicocele surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Kelly A Chiles; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.