Literature DB >> 11287015

Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.

B J Van Voorhis1, M Barnett, A E Sparks, C H Syrop, G Rosenthal, J Dawson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors for achieving a pregnancy with intrauterine insemination (IUI) and IVF. To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IUI and IVF based on semen analysis results.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic university hospital-based infertility center. PATIENT(S): One thousand thirty-nine infertile couples undergoing 3,479 IUI cycles. Four hundred twenty-four infertile couples undergoing 551 IVF cycles. INTERVENTION(S): IUI and IVF treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the significance of prognostic factors including a woman's age, gravidity, duration of infertility, diagnoses, use of ovulation induction, and sperm parameters for predicting the outcomes of clinical pregnancy and live birth rate after the first cycle of IUI and IVF. The relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these treatments were then determined based on sperm count results. RESULT(S): Female age, gravidity, and use of ovulation induction were all independent factors in predicting pregnancy after IUI. The average total motile sperm count in the ejaculate was also an important factor, with a threshold value of 10 million. For IVF, only female age was an important predictor for both clinical and ongoing pregnancy. When the average total motile sperm count was under 10 million, IVF with ICSI was more cost-effective than IUI in our clinic. CONCLUSION(S): An average total motile sperm count of 10 million may be a useful threshold value for decisions about treating a couple with IUI or IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11287015     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01783-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  38 in total

Review 1.  A New Dawn for Intrauterine Insemination: Efficient and Prudent Practice will Benefit Patients, the Fertility Industry and the Healthcare Bodies.

Authors:  Gulam Bahadur; Roy Homburg; Ansam Al-Habib
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-08-22

2.  Success in pregnancy through intrauterine insemination at first cycle in 300 infertile couples: an analysis.

Authors:  Babita Panda; Lita Mohapatra; Mahesh C Sahu; Rabindra N Padhy
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-12-01

3.  Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Erin B Mankus; Alan E Holden; Paige M Seeker; Jordan C Kampschmidt; Jessica E McLaughlin; Robert S Schenken; Jennifer F Knudtson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Embryo quality and implantation rates are not influenced by total motile count values in an ICSI programme: a novel point of view.

Authors:  Anat Hershko-Klement; Einav Rovner; Daniel Yekutieli; Yehudith Ghetler; Ofer Gonen; Ilan Cohen; Amir Wiser; Arie Berkovitz; Adrian Shulman
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2012-08-31

Review 5.  A step-wise approach to sperm retrieval in men with neurogenic anejaculation.

Authors:  Mikkel Fode; Dana A Ohl; Jens Sønksen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Improved pregnancy rate with administration of hCG after intrauterine insemination: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ilkka Y Järvelä; Juha S Tapanainen; Hannu Martikainen
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  The evaluation of pre and post processing semen analysis parameters at the time of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility and pregnancy rates based on stimulation agent. A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Luco; Chioma Agbo; Barry Behr; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Yulian Zhao; Nikos Vlahos; David Wyncott; Carolina Petrella; Jairo Garcia; Howard Zacur; Edward E Wallach
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The cost effectiveness of intracyctoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Authors:  Bruce Hollingsworth; Anthony Harris; Duncan Mortimer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Abdelkader; John Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.