Literature DB >> 12078837

An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI.

JohnA Collins1.   

Abstract

The health economics of IVF and ICSI involve assessments of utilization, cost, cost-effectiveness and ability to pay. In 48 countries, utilization averaged 289 IVF/ICSI cycles per million of population per annum, ranging from two in Kazachstan, to 1657 in Israel. Higher national utilization of IVF/ICSI was associated with higher quality of health services, as indicated by lower infant mortality rates. IVF and ICSI are scientifically demanding and personnel-intensive, and are therefore expensive procedures. The average cost per IVF/ICSI cycle in 2002 would be US$9547 in the USA, and US$3518 in 25 other countries. Price elasticity estimates suggest that a 10% decrease in IVF/ICSI cost would generate a 30% increase in utilization. The average cost-effectiveness ratios in 2002 would be US$58,394 per live birth in the USA, and US$22,048 in other countries. In three randomized controlled trials, incremental costs per additional live birth with IVF compared with conventional therapy were US$ -26,586, $79,472 and $47,749. The national costs of IVF/ICSI treatment would be US$1.00 per capita in one current model, but the costs to individual couples range from 10% of annual household expenditures in European countries to 25% in Canada and the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12078837     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/8.3.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  48 in total

Review 1.  The role of the medical andrologist in the assisted reproduction era.

Authors:  A Lenzi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Egg recovery completed with a "manually-created" negative pressure is still an option in cases of emergency or "low-cost" in vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Theodoros Kalampokas; Abha Maheswari
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-11-02

3.  Improvement of accuracy of clinical reports--the case of IVF cycle rank.

Authors:  Yaakov Rosenfeld; Avshalom Strulov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Public financing of IVF: a review of policy rationales.

Authors:  Philipa Mladovsky; Corinna Sorenson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-04-03

5.  Socially based discrimination against clinically appropriate care.

Authors:  Jeff Nisker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  IVF cycle cost estimation using Activity Based Costing and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Lucia Cassettari; Marco Mosca; Roberto Mosca; Fabio Rolando; Mauro Costa; Valerio Pisaturo
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-04-22

7.  Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States.

Authors:  James F Smith; Michael L Eisenberg; David Glidden; Susan G Millstein; Marcelle Cedars; Thomas J Walsh; Jonathan Showstack; Lauri A Pasch; Nancy Adler; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin MacDougall; Anne C Davis; Yewoubdar Beyene
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A Comparison of Immigrant and Canadian-Born Patients Seeking Fertility Treatment.

Authors:  Phyllis Zelkowitz; Leonora King; Rob Whitley; Togas Tulandi; Carolyn Ells; Nancy Feeley; Ian Gold; Zeev Rosberger; Peter Chan; Sharon Bond; Neal Mahutte; Sophia Ouhilal; Hananel Holzer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-08

10.  In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.