Literature DB >> 18006771

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of topotecan in pediatric cancer patients.

Paula Schaiquevich1, John C Panetta, Lisa C Iacono, Burgess B Freeman, Victor M Santana, Amar Gajjar, Clinton F Stewart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of topotecan lactone in children with cancer and identify covariates related to topotecan disposition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 162 children in seven clinical trials receiving single agent topotecan as a 30-min infusion. A population approach via nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to conduct the analysis.
RESULTS: A two-compartment model was fit to topotecan lactone plasma concentrations (n = 1874), and large pharmacokinetic variability was observed among studies, among individuals, and within individuals. We conducted a covariate analysis using demographics, biochemical data, trial effects, and concomitant drugs. The most significant covariate was body surface area, which explained 54% of the interindividual variability for topotecan systemic clearance. Interoccasion variability was considerable in both clearance and volume (20% and 22%, respectively), but was less than interindividual variability in both variables. Other covariates related to clearance were concomitant phenytoin, calculated glomerular filtration rate, and age (<0.5 years). Including them in the model reduced the interindividual variability for topotecan clearance by an additional 48% relative to the body surface area-normalized model. The full covariate model explained 76% and 50% of interindividual variability in topotecan clearance and volume, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a descriptive and robust population pharmacokinetic model which identified patient covariates that account for topotecan disposition in pediatric patients. Additionally, dosing topotecan based on the covariate model led to a more accurate and precise estimation topotecan systemic exposure compared with a fixed dosing approach, and could be a tool to assist clinicians to individualize topotecan dosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006771     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing drug development of anti-cancer drugs in children using modelling and simulation.

Authors:  Johan G C van Hasselt; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Christine M Hartford; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of AR-67, a lactone stable camptothecin analogue, in cancer patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  Fei Tang; Eleftheria Tsakalozou; Susanne M Arnold; Chee M Ng; Markos Leggas
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Determining success rates of the current pharmacokinetically guided dosing approach of topotecan in pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Anna Birg Mitchell; Aksana Vasilyeva; Amar Gajjar; Victor M Santana; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Phase I Study of Topotecan, Ifosfamide, and Etoposide (TIME) with autologous stem cell transplant in refractory cancer: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlates.

Authors:  Janelle B Perkins; Steven C Goldstein; Jana L Dawson; Jongphil Kim; Teresa L Field; James S Partyka; Karen K Fields; Beth L Maddox; Christine E Simonelli; Anthony M Neuger; Richard M Lush; Daniel M Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Topotecan and vincristine combination is effective against advanced bilateral intraocular retinoblastoma and has manageable toxicity.

Authors:  Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Catherine A Billups; Michael Tagen; Clinton F Stewart; Jianrong Wu; Kathleen Helton; M Beth McCarville; Thomas E Merchant; Rachel Brennan; Tammy M Free; Vicki Given; Barrett G Haik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effect on Prediction when Modeling Covariates in Bayesian Nonparametric Models.

Authors:  Alejandro Cruz-Marcelo; Gary L Rosner; Peter Müller; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Stat Theory Pract       Date:  2013-04-01

8.  Camptothecin-based regimens for treatment of ewing sarcoma: past studies and future directions.

Authors:  Lars Wagner
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2011-04-06

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology of cytotoxic drugs in neonates and infants: Providing evidence-based dosing guidance.

Authors:  A Laura Nijstad; Shelby Barnett; Arief Lalmohamed; Inez M Bérénos; Elizabeth Parke; Vickyanne Carruthers; Deborah A Tweddle; Jordon Kong; C Michel Zwaan; Alwin D R Huitema; Gareth J Veal
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 9.162

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.