PURPOSE: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of topotecan lactone in children with cancer and identify covariates related to topotecan disposition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 162 children in seven clinical trials receiving single agent topotecan as a 30-min infusion. A population approach via nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to conduct the analysis. RESULTS: A two-compartment model was fit to topotecan lactone plasma concentrations (n = 1874), and large pharmacokinetic variability was observed among studies, among individuals, and within individuals. We conducted a covariate analysis using demographics, biochemical data, trial effects, and concomitant drugs. The most significant covariate was body surface area, which explained 54% of the interindividual variability for topotecan systemic clearance. Interoccasion variability was considerable in both clearance and volume (20% and 22%, respectively), but was less than interindividual variability in both variables. Other covariates related to clearance were concomitant phenytoin, calculated glomerular filtration rate, and age (<0.5 years). Including them in the model reduced the interindividual variability for topotecan clearance by an additional 48% relative to the body surface area-normalized model. The full covariate model explained 76% and 50% of interindividual variability in topotecan clearance and volume, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a descriptive and robust population pharmacokinetic model which identified patient covariates that account for topotecan disposition in pediatric patients. Additionally, dosing topotecan based on the covariate model led to a more accurate and precise estimation topotecan systemic exposure compared with a fixed dosing approach, and could be a tool to assist clinicians to individualize topotecan dosing.
PURPOSE: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of topotecan lactone in children with cancer and identify covariates related to topotecan disposition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 162 children in seven clinical trials receiving single agent topotecan as a 30-min infusion. A population approach via nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to conduct the analysis. RESULTS: A two-compartment model was fit to topotecan lactone plasma concentrations (n = 1874), and large pharmacokinetic variability was observed among studies, among individuals, and within individuals. We conducted a covariate analysis using demographics, biochemical data, trial effects, and concomitant drugs. The most significant covariate was body surface area, which explained 54% of the interindividual variability for topotecan systemic clearance. Interoccasion variability was considerable in both clearance and volume (20% and 22%, respectively), but was less than interindividual variability in both variables. Other covariates related to clearance were concomitant phenytoin, calculated glomerular filtration rate, and age (<0.5 years). Including them in the model reduced the interindividual variability for topotecan clearance by an additional 48% relative to the body surface area-normalized model. The full covariate model explained 76% and 50% of interindividual variability in topotecan clearance and volume, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a descriptive and robust population pharmacokinetic model which identified patient covariates that account for topotecan disposition in pediatric patients. Additionally, dosing topotecan based on the covariate model led to a more accurate and precise estimation topotecan systemic exposure compared with a fixed dosing approach, and could be a tool to assist clinicians to individualize topotecan dosing.
Authors: Johan G C van Hasselt; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anna Birg Mitchell; Aksana Vasilyeva; Amar Gajjar; Victor M Santana; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Janelle B Perkins; Steven C Goldstein; Jana L Dawson; Jongphil Kim; Teresa L Field; James S Partyka; Karen K Fields; Beth L Maddox; Christine E Simonelli; Anthony M Neuger; Richard M Lush; Daniel M Sullivan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Catherine A Billups; Michael Tagen; Clinton F Stewart; Jianrong Wu; Kathleen Helton; M Beth McCarville; Thomas E Merchant; Rachel Brennan; Tammy M Free; Vicki Given; Barrett G Haik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Laura Nijstad; Shelby Barnett; Arief Lalmohamed; Inez M Bérénos; Elizabeth Parke; Vickyanne Carruthers; Deborah A Tweddle; Jordon Kong; C Michel Zwaan; Alwin D R Huitema; Gareth J Veal Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 9.162