Literature DB >> 30820810

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of AR-67, a lactone stable camptothecin analogue, in cancer patients with solid tumors.

Fei Tang1, Eleftheria Tsakalozou1, Susanne M Arnold2,3, Chee M Ng1,3, Markos Leggas4,5.   

Abstract

Background AR-67 is a novel camptothecin analogue at early stages of drug development. The phase 1 clinical trial in cancer patients with solid tumors was completed and a population pharmacokinetic model (POP PK) was developed to facilitate further development of this investigational agent. Methods Pharmacokinetic data collected in the phase 1 clinical trial were utilized for the development of a population POP PK by implementing the non-linear mixed effects approach. Patient characteristics at study entry were evaluated as covariates in the model. Subjects (N = 26) were treated at nine dosage levels (1.2-12.4 mg/m2/day) on a daily × 5 schedule. Hematological toxicity data were modeled against exposure metrics. Results A two-compartment POP PK model best described the disposition of AR-67 by fitting a total of 328 PK observations from 25 subjects. Following covariate model selection, age remained as a significant covariate on central volume. The final model provided a good fit for the concentration versus time data and PK parameters were estimated with good precision. Clearance, inter-compartmental clearance, central volume and peripheral volume were estimated to be 32.2 L/h, 28.6 L/h, 6.83 L and 25.0 L, respectively. Finally, exposure-pharmacodynamic analysis using Emax models showed that plasma drug concentration versus time profiles are better predictors of AR-67-related hematologic toxicity were better predictors of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, as compared to total dose. Conclusions A POP PK model was developed to characterize AR-67 pharmacokinetics and identified age as a significant covariate. Exposure PK metrics Cmax and AUC were shown to predict hematological toxicity. Further efforts to identify clinically relevant determinants of AR-67 disposition and effects in a larger patient population are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AR-67; Camptothecins; Performance status; Population pharmacokinetics

Year:  2019        PMID: 30820810      PMCID: PMC6713628          DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00744-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  55 in total

1.  Life-threatening myelosuppression in patients with occult renal impairment receiving topotecan.

Authors:  S O'Reilly; D K Armstrong; L B Grochow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Impact of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination in adults and children.

Authors:  Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  The cascade radical annulation approach to new analogues of camptothecins. Combinatorial synthesis of silatecans and homosilatecans.

Authors:  D P Curran; H Josien; D Bom; A E Gabarda; W Du
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  The highly lipophilic DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor DB-67 displays elevated lactone levels in human blood and potent anticancer activity.

Authors:  D Bom; D P Curran; J Zhang; S G Zimmer; R Bevins; S Kruszewski; J N Howe; A Bingcang; L J Latus; T G Burke
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Population pharmacokinetic and adverse event analysis of topotecan in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  Diane R Mould; Nicholas H G Holford; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Paul R Hutson; Hilde Rosing; Willem W ten Bokkel Huinink; Eric K Rowinsky; Joan H Schiller; Mark Russo; Graham Ross
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Potent topoisomerase I inhibition by novel silatecans eliminates glioma proliferation in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  I F Pollack; M Erff; D Bom; T G Burke; J T Strode; D P Curran
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites: a population analysis.

Authors:  Rujia Xie; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alex Sparreboom; Jaap Verweij; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Induction of cytochrome P4501A by smoking or omeprazole in comparison with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase in biopsies of human duodenal mucosa.

Authors:  J Buchthal; K E Grund; A Buchmann; D Schrenk; P Beaune; K W Bock
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Obesity, sex, and acetaminophen disposition.

Authors:  D R Abernethy; M Divoll; D J Greenblatt; B Ameer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis.

Authors:  F Léger; W J Loos; J Fourcade; R Bugat; M Goffinet; R H J Mathijssen; J Verweij; A Sparreboom; E Chatelut
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Looking for the Holy Grail-Drug Candidates for Glioblastoma Multiforme Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Beata Pająk
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.