Literature DB >> 18004783

Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus C(alpha) contact potential.

Hongyi Zhou1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

In this work, we develop a fully automated method for the quality assessment prediction of protein structural models generated by structure prediction approaches such as fold recognition servers, or ab initio methods. The approach is based on fragment comparisons and a consensus C(alpha) contact potential derived from the set of models to be assessed and was tested on CASP7 server models. The average Pearson linear correlation coefficient between predicted quality and model GDT-score per target is 0.83 for the 98 targets, which is better than those of other quality assessment methods that participated in CASP7. Our method also outperforms the other methods by about 3% as assessed by the total GDT-score of the selected top models. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18004783      PMCID: PMC2725406          DOI: 10.1002/prot.21813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  35 in total

1.  Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models.

Authors:  D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis.

Authors:  J Skolnick; J S Fetrow; A Kolinski
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: results from linear optimization.

Authors:  D Tobi; R Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-10-01

5.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

7.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.

Authors:  J Lundström; L Rychlewski; J Bujnicki; A Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Y Xia; E S Huang; M Levitt; R Samudrala
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Analysis of TASSER-based CASP7 protein structure prediction results.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Shashi B Pandit; Seung Yup Lee; Jose Borreguero; Huiling Chen; Liliana Wroblewska; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007
View more
  18 in total

1.  Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

2.  Template-based protein structure modeling using TASSER(VMT.).

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-22

3.  Protein structure prediction by pro-Sp3-TASSER.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Applying undertaker cost functions to model quality assessment.

Authors:  John Archie; Kevin Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-05-15

5.  Protein structure prediction enhanced with evolutionary diversity: SPEED.

Authors:  Joe DeBartolo; Glen Hocky; Michael Wilde; Jinbo Xu; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Applying Undertaker to quality assessment.

Authors:  John G Archie; Martin Paluszewski; Kevin Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

7.  Fast geometric consensus approach for protein model quality assessment.

Authors:  Rafal Adamczak; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Brinda K Vallat; Jaroslaw Meller
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 8.  Template-based protein modeling: recent methodological advances.

Authors:  Pankaj R Daga; Ronak Y Patel; Robert J Doerksen
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Torsten Schwede; Silvio Ce Tosatto
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-20

10.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.