Literature DB >> 18004535

[MR colography: technique, indications, and findings].

T C Lauenstein1, S Kinner, S C Ladd.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved as a powerful tool that has been applied more and more in recent years for the assessment of gastrointestinal structures, owing to its unsurpassed soft tissue contrast, lack of radiation exposure, and implementation of fast scanning techniques. As a virtual endoscopic technique, MR colography (MRC) makes it possible to image inflammatory processes and tumor disease of the large intestine with a high degree of accuracy. In this article we describe current techniques and applications of MRC and give an overview of clinical studies comparing MRC with other diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18004535     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-007-1586-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  24 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.

Authors:  G Pappalardo; E Polettini; F M Frattaroli; E Casciani; C D'Orta; M D'Amato; G F Gualdi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Health effects of ionising radiation from diagnostic CT.

Authors:  Diego R Martin; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Mathias Goyen; Jost Langhorst; Stefan G Ruehm; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Thomas C Lauenstein; Gregor Pelster; Gerald Holtmann; Stefan G Ruehm; Joerg F Debatin; Susanne C Goehde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies.

Authors:  Rahime Haykir; Serdar Karakose; Aydin Karabacakoglu; Mustafa Sahin; Ertugrul Kayacetin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.

Authors:  Maria H Svensson; Elisabeth Svensson; Anders Lasson; Mikael Hellström
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited.

Authors:  Elmar M Merkle; Brian M Dale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.

Authors:  T C Lauenstein; C U Herborn; F M Vogt; S C Göhde; J F Debatin; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-09

10.  MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Michael Nuefer; Thomas Zoepf; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.