Literature DB >> 11818597

Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.

Maria H Svensson1, Elisabeth Svensson, Anders Lasson, Mikael Hellström.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate, by means of self-assessed questionnaires, patient acceptance of computed tomographic (CT) colonography compared with that of conventional colonoscopy, when performed in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven patients underwent CT colonography followed immediately by conventional colonoscopy. Patient acceptance was evaluated with questionnaires, and the proportions of patients who favored one examination were compared. The main variables were overall impression, discomfort during air filling or instrumentation, and perceived pain, evaluated by using ordered verbal descriptor scales after each examination. The preference for either examination was evaluated after completion of both examinations.
RESULTS: Of the 68 patients who favored one examination, 56 (82%) preferred CT colonography (P <.00001). Concerning overall impression of problems or discomfort in connection with the examination, 49 (69%) of 71 with a preference considered colonoscopy to be more difficult (P =.002). CT colonography was regarded as "not painful" by 62 (57%) of 108 patients compared with 28 (26%) for colonoscopy, and a larger proportion of patients rated pain as higher during colonoscopy than during CT colonography (95% CI: 30%, 56%). Discomfort from air filling of the colon was the major complaint about CT colonography.
CONCLUSION: CT colonography was considered less painful and less difficult overall than colonoscopy and was the preferred examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818597     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2222010669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  42 in total

1.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images.

Authors:  K Ledenius; E Svensson; F Stålhammar; L-M Wiklund; A Thilander-Klang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Detection of relevant colonic neoplasms with PET/CT: promising accuracy with minimal CT dose and a standardised PET cut-off.

Authors:  Wolfgang Luboldt; Teresa Volker; Bärbel Wiedemann; Klaus Zöphel; Ursula Wehrmann; Arne Koch; Todd Toussaint; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Markus Middendorp; Daniela Aust; Jörg Kotzerke; Frank Grünwald; Thomas J Vogl; Hans-Joachim Luboldt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity.

Authors:  W M Ajaj; T C Lauenstein; G Pelster; G Gerken; S G Ruehm; J F Debatin; S C Goehde
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  CT colonography in cancer detection: methods and results.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Thomas Mang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Does training and experience influence the accuracy of computed tomography colonography interpretation?

Authors:  Greg Rosenfeld; Yi Tzu Nancy Fu; Brendan Quiney; Hong Qian; Darin Krygier; Jacquie Brown; Patrick Vos; Pari Tiwari; Jennifer Telford; Brian Bressler; Robert Enns
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

10.  Predictors of CT colonography utilization among asymptomatic medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Michael Harhay; Anna Lev-Toaff; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.