Literature DB >> 18003712

The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: their basis and application.

J D Harrison1, C Streffer.   

Abstract

Equivalent and effective dose are protection quantities defined by the The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). They are frequently referred to simply as dose and may be misused. They provide a method for the summation of doses received from external sources and from intakes of radionuclides for comparison with dose limits and constraints, set to limit the risk of cancer and hereditary effects. For the assessment of internal doses, ICRP provides dose coefficients (Sv Bq(-1)) for the ingestion or inhalation of radionuclides by workers and members of the public, including children. Dose coefficients have also been calculated for in utero exposures following maternal intakes and for the transfer of radionuclides in breast milk. In each case, values are given of committed equivalent doses to organs and tissues and committed effective dose. Their calculation involves the use of defined biokinetic and dosimetric models, including the use of reference phantoms representing the human body. Radiation weighting factors are used as a simple representation of the different effectiveness of different radiations in causing stochastic effects at low doses. A single set of tissue weighting factors is used to take account of the contribution of individual organs and tissues to overall detriment from cancer and hereditary effects, despite age- and gender-related differences in estimates of risk and contributions to risk. The results are quantities that are not individual specific but are reference values for protection purposes, relating to doses to phantoms. The ICRP protection quantities are not intended for detailed assessments of dose and risk to individuals. They should not be used in epidemiological analyses or the assessment of the possibility of occurrence and severity of tissue reactions (deterministic effects) at higher doses. Dose coefficients are published as reference values and as such have no associated uncertainty. Assessments of uncertainties may be appropriate in specific analyses of doses and risks and in epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003712     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncm248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  8 in total

1.  Abdominal pediatric cancer surveillance using serial computed tomography: evaluation of organ absorbed dose and effective dose.

Authors:  Diana Lam; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges; John P McGahan; Robin Stern; John M Boone
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Patient radiation dose in diagnostic and interventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms: experience at a single center.

Authors:  Chang Woo Chun; Bum-Soo Kim; Cheol Hyoun Lee; Yon Kwon Ihn; Yong-Sam Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  A GPU-accelerated framework for individualized estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; Justin Brown; William Paul Segars; Wesley Bolch; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update.

Authors:  F Ramsthaler; P Proschek; W Betz; M A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.

Authors:  Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.922

Review 6.  Correlation between effective dose and radiological risk: general concepts.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Costa; Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura; Denise Yanikian Nersissian; Camila Souza Melo
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun

7.  Navigation and non-navigation CT scan of the sinuses: comparison of the effective doses of radiation in children and adults.

Authors:  Noémie Villemure-Poliquin; Mario Chrétien; Jacques E Leclerc
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-11-19

8.  Radiation exposure in the endovascular therapy of cranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fistula in the last decade: a retrospective, single-center observational study.

Authors:  Marcel Opitz; Sebastian Zensen; Denise Bos; Yan Li; Hanna Styczen; Axel Wetter; Nika Guberina; Ramazan Jabbarli; Ulrich Sure; Michael Forsting; Isabel Wanke; Cornelius Deuschl
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.804

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.