Literature DB >> 18001786

Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens.

Sutchin R Patel1, Mark Sigman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared postoperative semen analysis parameters and patency rates of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted vs straight portion of the vas deferens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of patients that underwent bilateral vasovasostomy in the straight and convoluted vas deferens by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Patient age, partner age, obstructive interval, gross and microscopic appearance of the intraoperative fluid aspirated from the testicular portion of the vas deferens, and postoperative semen analysis results were examined. Patency was defined as any sperm in the postoperative ejaculate and was compared for the 2 groups.
RESULTS: A total of 42 and 64 patients underwent bilateral straight vasovasostomy and convoluted vasovasostomy, respectively. Mean patient age for straight and convoluted vasovasostomy was 38.5 and 40.3 years, respectively. Mean obstructive interval for straight vasovasostomy and convoluted vasovasostomy was 7.7 and 8.6 years, respectively. No significant differences in the postoperative semen analysis parameters of volume, total count, sperm density, motility or total motile count were found between the 2 groups. The patency rate was 98.1% and 97.3% for convoluted vasovasostomy and straight vasovasostomy, respectively, and was not statistically different.
CONCLUSIONS: Although vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens is considered technically more challenging than in the straight vas deferens, patency rates and postoperative semen analysis parameters for convoluted vasovasostomy and straight vasovasostomy are comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18001786     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Lindsey Herrel; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Scovell; Douglas A Mata; Ranjith Ramasamy; Lindsey A Herrel; Wayland Hsiao; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Reinforcing vasal suture technique improves sperm concentration and pregnancy rates in men undergoing vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Joshua Savage; Madeleine Manka; Tiffany Rindels; Manaf Alom; Kiran L Sharma; Landon Trost
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

Review 5.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.

Authors:  Karen Baker; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Robotic microsurgery in male infertility and urology-taking robotics to the next level.

Authors:  Ahmet Gudeloglu; Jamin V Brahmbhatt; Sijo J Parekattil
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-03

Review 7.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.