Literature DB >> 32055470

Reinforcing vasal suture technique improves sperm concentration and pregnancy rates in men undergoing vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal.

Joshua Savage1, Madeleine Manka2, Tiffany Rindels2, Manaf Alom2, Kiran L Sharma2, Landon Trost1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasovasostomy (VV) is a well-described surgical technique with few notable modifications since microsurgical adaptation in the 1970s. Although contemporary reversal success rates are 70-90%, these most often are based on a lenient definition of >0 sperm (patency) and include only VV procedures. With stricter definitions, success rates drop >30%. To improve outcomes, a novel surgical technique (reinforcing vasal suture, ReVas) was developed, and outcomes were compared prior to and following implementation.
METHODS: A prospective registry of sequential patients undergoing vasectomy reversal was queried from Jan 2014 to June 2019. The ReVas technique was implemented in Jan 2018, wherein the abdominal and testicular vasa are secured side-to-side to alleviate strain on the anastomosis. Primary outcomes were changes in sperm concentration: >0/mL, >100,000/mL, >1 million/mL, >5 million/mL, >15 million/mL, and most recent. Secondary outcome was pregnancy rate. Demographic, clinical, and select operative variables were statistically compared between ReVas (+) and (-) cohorts.
RESULTS: A total of 200 men underwent reversal, of whom 169 represented first-time attempts (61 receiving the new technique) and comprise the current cohort. ReVas (+) and (-) cohorts were similar in demographic, clinical, and operative factors with the exception of operative time [longer in ReVas (+) group]. Median duration since vasectomy was 9 years, and 68.6% of men received a bilateral VV. Follow-up was significantly longer in the ReVas (-) arm (37 vs. 10 months). All primary outcomes were significantly higher in the ReVas (+) cohort, with odds ratios ranging from 5.8 to 11.1 (P<0.01 to 0.0001). Pregnancy rates within the first 2 years post reversal were also 8.1× higher in the ReVas (+) group (P=0.02). A subset of men with bilateral VV exhibited a 95% likelihood of achieving >15 million/mL in ReVas (+) men compared to 54% in ReVas (-). Multivariable analysis confirmed ReVas as an independent predictor of success.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ReVas technique resulted in significantly higher sperm concentrations, which were particularly pronounced when stricter success criteria were used. Patients were also 8.1× more likely to achieve a pregnancy within the first 2 years, confirming clinical relevance. External validation is warranted. 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vasectomy reversal (VR); epididymovasostomy (EV); microsurgery; pregnancy; vasovasostomy (VV)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32055470      PMCID: PMC6995932          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


  13 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Larry I Lipshultz; Jon A Rumohr; Richard C Bennett
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Outcomes of microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsey A Herrel; Michael Goodman; Marc Goldstein; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  The Kinetics of Sperm Return and Late Failure Following Vasovasostomy or Vasoepididymostomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nicholas J Farber; Ryan Flannigan; Peng Li; Philip S Li; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Vasovasostomy: results of questionnaire of members of the American Urological Association.

Authors:  F C Derrick; W Yarbrough; J D'Agostino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Vasectomy reversal semen analysis: new reference ranges predict pregnancy.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Nicholas N Tadros; A Scott Polackwich; Rakesh Sharma; Ashok Agarwal; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens.

Authors:  Sutchin R Patel; Mark Sigman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group.

Authors:  A M Belker; A J Thomas; E F Fuchs; J W Konnak; I D Sharlip
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Loupe-Assisted Vasovasostomy Using a Prolene Stent: A Simpler Vasectomy Reversal Technique.

Authors:  Jong Chul Jeon; Taekmin Kwon; Sejun Park; Sungchan Park; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Kyung Hyun Moon
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.400

9.  Office-based andrology and male infertility procedures-a cost-effective alternative.

Authors:  Manaf Alom; Matthew Ziegelmann; Josh Savage; Tanner Miest; Tobias S Köhler; Landon Trost
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08

Review 10.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.