Literature DB >> 18000949

Equity, governance and financing after health care reform: lessons from Mexico.

Armando Arredondo1, Emanuel Orozco.   

Abstract

To determine, from the perspective of providers, community leaders and users of health services, equity, governance and health financing outcomes of the Mexican health system reform.Cross-sectional study oriented towards the qualitative analysis of financing, governance and equity indicators for the uninsured population. Taking into account feasibility, as well as political and technical criteria, six Mexican states were selected as study populations and a qualitative research was conducted during 2004-2006. Two hundred and forty in-depth interviews were applied, in all selected states, to 60 decision-makers, including medical and administrative personnel; 60 service providers at health centres; 60 representatives of civil organizations, including municipal representatives and, finally, 60 members of health committees and users of services at second and first levels of care units. The analysis of interviews was performed using ATLAS-Ti software. An outcome mapping of health reform was developed. For political actors, Mexican health system reform has not modified dependence on the central level; ignorance about reform strategies and lack of participation in the search for financial resources to finance health systems were evidenced. Also, in all states under study, community leaders and users of services reported the need to improve an effective accountability system at both municipal and state levels. Health strategies for equity, governance and financing do not have adequate mechanisms to promote participation from all social actors. Improving this situation is a very important goal in the Mexican health democratization process, in the context of health care reform. There are relevant positive and negative effects of the reform on equity, governance and financing in health. Special emphasis is placed on the analysis of lessons learned in Mexico and the usefulness of the main strengths and weaknesses, as relevant evidences for other middle-income countries which are designing, implementing and evaluating reform strategies in order to achieve equity in resource allocation, good levels of governance and a greater financial protection in health.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18000949     DOI: 10.1002/hpm.913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


  5 in total

Review 1.  Decentralization of health systems in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Cobos Muñoz; Paloma Merino Amador; Laura Monzon Llamas; David Martinez Hernandez; Juana Maria Santos Sancho
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Determining Core Components in Accreditation of Limited Surgery Facilities in Iran.

Authors:  Nader Asgari; Somayeh Hessam; Irvan Masoudi Asl; Shaghayegh Vahdat
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2020-06-25

3.  Growing Pains at Hospitals: Opportunities and Issues of Service Expansion in Maximum Care.

Authors:  Juergen Hinkelmann; Joachim Paul Hasebrook; Thomas Volkert; Klaus Hahnenkamp
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-28

4.  Avian and pandemic human influenza policy in South-East Asia: the interface between economic and public health imperatives.

Authors:  Petcharat Pongcharoensuk; Wiku Adisasmito; Le Minh Sat; Pornpit Silkavute; Lilis Muchlisoh; Pham Cong Hoat; Richard Coker
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.344

5.  Economic burden to primary informal caregivers of hospitalized older adults in Mexico: a cohort study.

Authors:  Mariana López-Ortega; Carmen García-Peña; Víctor Granados-García; José Juan García-González; Mario Ulises Pérez-Zepeda
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.