Daniel Cobos Muñoz1,2, Paloma Merino Amador3, Laura Monzon Llamas4,5, David Martinez Hernandez6, Juana Maria Santos Sancho6. 1. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, PO Box 4002, Basel, Switzerland. daniel.cobos@unibas.ch. 2. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. daniel.cobos@unibas.ch. 3. Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. 4. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, PO Box 4002, Basel, Switzerland. 5. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 6. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A substantial number of low and middle income countries (LMICs) have implemented health sector reforms in the last 40 years, and the majority of them have included some degree of decentralization of the health system as part of the wider reform. This review will provide an updated and comprehensive assessment of the effects of decentralization in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published and grey literature till May 2015, following standard methods. RESULTS: 54 qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies conducted in 26 countries were included in the review. We found positive and negative effects of decentralization of health systems in LMICs. Whereas decentralization of governance, financing and service delivery, have been shown to have positive effects on the system; decentralization of resource management has been challenging in several settings. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lessons learned from LMICs suggest that factors such as adequate mix of technical skills at the local level to perform decentralized tasks, effective decentralization of decision-making to the periphery, and political leadership are key factors for a successful decentralization.
OBJECTIVES: A substantial number of low and middle income countries (LMICs) have implemented health sector reforms in the last 40 years, and the majority of them have included some degree of decentralization of the health system as part of the wider reform. This review will provide an updated and comprehensive assessment of the effects of decentralization in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published and grey literature till May 2015, following standard methods. RESULTS: 54 qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies conducted in 26 countries were included in the review. We found positive and negative effects of decentralization of health systems in LMICs. Whereas decentralization of governance, financing and service delivery, have been shown to have positive effects on the system; decentralization of resource management has been challenging in several settings. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lessons learned from LMICs suggest that factors such as adequate mix of technical skills at the local level to perform decentralized tasks, effective decentralization of decision-making to the periphery, and political leadership are key factors for a successful decentralization.
Keywords:
Decentralization; District health system; Governance; Health sector reform; LMIC; Systematic review; UHC; Universal health coverage
Authors: J K Kangangi; D Kibuga; J Muli; D Maher; N Billo; L N'gang'a; E Ngugi; V Kimani Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Saad Ahmed Ali Jadoo; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Seher Nur Sulku; Amrizal Muhammad Nur Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Chris Jenkins; Tran Thu Ngan; Nguyen Bao Ngoc; Tran Bich Phuong; Lynne Lohfeld; Michael Donnelly; Hoang Van Minh; Liam Murray Journal: Glob Health Res Policy Date: 2019-01-30
Authors: Isabelle Feldhaus; Carl Schütte; Francis D Mwansa; Masauso Undi; Stanley Banda; Chris Suharlim; Nicolas A Menzies; Logan Brenzel; Stephen C Resch; Anthony Kinghorn Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.344