Literature DB >> 17999971

daptomycin activity against Staphylococcus aureus following vancomycin exposure in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Warren E Rose1, Steven N Leonard, George Sakoulas, Glenn W Kaatz, Marcus J Zervos, Anjly Sheth, Christopher F Carpenter, Michael J Rybak.   

Abstract

Recently, the emergence of reduced susceptibility to daptomycin has been linked to the reduced vancomycin susceptibility that occurs after vancomycin exposure in Staphylococcus aureus in vivo and in vitro. This study evaluated this propensity in clinical isolates of S. aureus using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations over 8 days. Five clinical isolates (four methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates and one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] isolate), all of which were reported to have become nonsusceptible to daptomycin, were evaluated. The following regimens were evaluated: vancomycin 1 g every 12 h for 4 days followed by daptomycin 6 mg/kg of body weight daily for 4 days and daptomycin 6 mg/kg daily for 8 days. If nonsusceptibility was detected, the following regimens were evaluated: no treatment for 4 days followed by daptomycin 6 mg/kg daily for 4 days, vancomycin 1 g every 12 h for 4 days followed by daptomycin 10 mg/kg daily for 4 days, and daptomycin 10 mg/kg daily for 8 days. The emergence of daptomycin nonsusceptibility (12- to 16-fold MIC increase) was detected only with the MSSA isolate with daptomycin 6 mg/kg daily for 4 days after vancomycin exposure. However, the bactericidal activity of daptomycin was maintained and the MIC increases of these isolates, which had no mprF or yycG mutations, were unstable to serial passage on antibiotic-free agar. Subsequent regimens did not demonstrate nonsusceptibility to daptomycin. These findings suggest that reduced daptomycin susceptibility can be a strain-specific and unstable event. Further evaluation of the susceptibility relationship between daptomycin and vancomycin is necessary to understand the factors involved and their clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999971      PMCID: PMC2258488          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00869-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation.

Authors:  S Stepanovic; D Vukovic; I Dakic; B Savic; M Svabic-Vlahovic
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Treatment outcomes for serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.

Authors:  Benjamin P Howden; Peter B Ward; Patrick G P Charles; Tony M Korman; Andrew Fuller; Philipp du Cros; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Sally A Roberts; Jenny Robson; Kerry Read; Narin Bak; James Hurley; Paul D R Johnson; Arthur J Morris; Barrie C Mayall; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  R L Akins; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Daptomycin dose-effect relationship against resistant gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  Raymond Cha; Richard G Grucz; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Clinical features associated with bacteremia due to heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Patrick G P Charles; Peter B Ward; Paul D R Johnson; Benjamin P Howden; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Correlation of daptomycin bactericidal activity and membrane depolarization in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jared A Silverman; Nancy G Perlmutter; Howard M Shapiro
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

Authors:  Robert D Arbeit; Dennis Maki; Francis P Tally; Edward Campanaro; Barry I Eisenstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Longzhu Cui; Xiaoxue Ma; Katsuhiro Sato; Keiko Okuma; Fred C Tenover; Elsa M Mamizuka; Curtis G Gemmell; Mi-Na Kim; Marie-Cecile Ploy; N El-Solh; Vivian Ferraz; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; David Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial endocarditis: an in vitro and in vivo simulation using historical and current dosing strategies.

Authors:  Warren E Rose; Michael J Rybak; Glenn W Kaatz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  32 in total

1.  Novel daptomycin combinations against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Celine Vidaillac; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Roles of tRNA in cell wall biosynthesis.

Authors:  Kiley Dare; Michael Ibba
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 3.  Mechanisms of drug resistance: daptomycin resistance.

Authors:  Truc T Tran; Jose M Munita; Cesar A Arias
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline and daptomycin against MRSA, hVISA, and VISA with and without prior vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Mao Hagihara; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Impact of Daptomycin Dose Exposure Alone or in Combination with β-Lactams or Rifampin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in an In Vitro Biofilm Model.

Authors:  Seyedehameneh Jahanbakhsh; Nivedita B Singh; Juwon Yim; Razieh Kebriaei; Jordan R Smith; Katherine Lev; T T Tran; Warren E Rose; Cesar A Arias; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Evaluation of the novel combination of high-dose daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Brian J Werth; Cortney E Ireland; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Tuning the properties of the bacterial membrane with aminoacylated phosphatidylglycerol.

Authors:  Hervé Roy
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.885

9.  Outcomes with daptomycin in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections with a range of vancomycin MICs.

Authors:  Jason A Crompton; Donald S North; MinJung Yoon; Judith N Steenbergen; Kenneth C Lamp; Graeme N Forrest
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Activity of telavancin against staphylococci and enterococci determined by MIC and resistance selection studies.

Authors:  Klaudia Kosowska-Shick; Catherine Clark; Glenn A Pankuch; Pamela McGhee; Bonifacio Dewasse; Linda Beachel; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.