Literature DB >> 16569141

Is the focus of attention in working memory expanded through practice?

Klaus Oberauer1.   

Abstract

This article reinvestigates the claim by P. Verhaeghen, J. Cerella, and C. Basak (2004) that the focus of attention in working memory can be expanded from 1 to 4 items through practice. Using a modified version of Verhaeghen et al.'s n-back paradigm, Experiments 1 and 3 show that a signature of a one-item focus, the time cost for switching between items in working memory, persists over practice. Verhaeghen et al. reported a shift over practice from a step function to a linear slope of reaction times over set size and argued that it reflects the expansion of the focus. With an improved counterbalancing scheme, a continuously increasing slope was found even without practice in Experiment 2. The results question the hypothesis that the focus is expanded through practice. They are in line with predictions from a model that distinguishes a one-item focus from a direct-access region holding about 4 items.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16569141     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  22 in total

Review 1.  The mind and brain of short-term memory.

Authors:  John Jonides; Richard L Lewis; Derek Evan Nee; Cindy A Lustig; Marc G Berman; Katherine Sledge Moore
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: a review.

Authors:  Claudia C von Bastian; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-10

3.  Stimulus-response bindings contribute to item switch costs in working memory.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-17

4.  Aging and switching the focus of attention in working memory: age differences in item availability but not in item accessibility.

Authors:  Chandramallika Basak; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Does working memory training have to be adaptive?

Authors:  Claudia C von Bastian; Anne Eschen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-26

6.  Comprehension of Linguistic Dependencies: Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Evidence for Direct-Access Retrieval From Memory.

Authors:  Stephani Foraker; Brian McElree
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2011-11

7.  Three layers of working memory: Focus-switch costs and retrieval dynamics as revealed by the N-count task.

Authors:  Chandramallika Basak; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011

8.  Dual representation of item positions in verbal short-term memory: Evidence for two access modes.

Authors:  Elke B Lange; Paul Verhaeghen; John Cerella
Journal:  Eur J Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010

9.  Can the focus of attention accommodate multiple, separate items?

Authors:  Amanda L Gilchrist; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.